Graalians
10 of 144 « First 6789 10 111213142060110 Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   Video Games (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Pokemon X and Pokemon Y (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14071)

Talon 04-07-2013 10:49 PM
Quote:
Posted by Jester Lapse (Post 326666)
Legendaries have no gender.
Lati@s duo, the Genies (Landorus, Tornadus, Thundurus), Cresselia and Heatran all have genders.

Sup3rn00b 04-07-2013 10:51 PM
Heatran is a legendary?

Mejico Josh 04-07-2013 10:52 PM
Quote:
Posted by Dusty (Post 326615)
That new MewThree(or whatever it will be called) just shows the huge gap between the designs of the older pokemon and the new ones. Though I will say it's possible the new one is a more accurate and successful clone of Mew, therefor it kind of justifies the "cute" and soft, round design. Otherwise you can see the big difference between the two:

http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/..._gen_i.png.jpg

http://images.nintendolife.com/news/...nt/0/large.jpg

Mewtwo had so many sharp edges and wasn't afraid of an angle or two in the lines. Pointy joints, muscular-like chest and pointy eyes with a bit of anger behind them. The new one is round, round... and more round.
Well it does have them ears which are pretty pointy so i guess they coukd be said

Remorse 04-07-2013 10:53 PM
Was gonna mention heatran earlier but I was entirely sure.

"Believe it or not, Heatran is a legendary pokemon even though it has a gender. As a matter of fact, all legendary pokemon were genderless until Generation 3 when Latias and Latios were the only legendaries with genders. Cresselia is also a legendary pokemon with a gender. Heatran is just the first and currently only legendary pokemon that doesn't have a set gender"

Sup3rn00b 04-07-2013 10:53 PM
Cresselia.

I am dead serious, I have NEVER heard of this thing.

Jester Lapse 04-07-2013 10:54 PM
Quote:
Posted by Talon (Post 326674)
Lati@s duo, the Genies (Landorus, Tornadus, Thundurus), Cresselia and Heatran all have genders.
Those are not legendaries. More like Sub-Legendary

Remorse 04-07-2013 11:04 PM
Quote:
Posted by Sup3rn00b (Post 326681)
Cresselia.

I am dead serious, I have NEVER heard of this thing.
http://i368.photobucket.com/albums/o.../cresselia.jpg

Quote:
Posted by Jester Lapse (Post 326682)
Those are not legendaries. More like Sub-Legendary
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wi...endary_Pokémon

Dusty 04-07-2013 11:07 PM
Quote:
Posted by Jester Lapse (Post 326682)
Those are not legendaries. More like Sub-Legendary
Über

Talon 04-07-2013 11:09 PM
Quote:
Posted by Jester Lapse (Post 326682)
Those are not legendaries. More like Sub-Legendary
Quote:
Posted by en.wikipedia.org
Known as the Eon Pokémon, Latias and Latios are two legendary Pokémon originating from the Ruby, Sapphire, and Emerald series of games. They are female and male respectively, and the first legendary Pokémon to have genders.
Quote:
Posted by bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net
Cresselia is one of six legendary Pokémon that has a definite gender, the other five being Latias (a female-only species), Latios (a male-only species) and the Kami trio (whose members are all male-only species).

Jester Lapse 04-07-2013 11:10 PM
Quote:
Posted by Remorse (Post 326688)
I refuse to accept them as legendaries. They hold no value (except latios and latias) and I refer to them as sub-legendaries because they are more or less of a filler to get more "legendary" pokemon in one game.

Yes, they are legendaries on the exterior, but they really miss the point of what getting a legendary was about, having a good backstory and being hard as hell to get. Like Mewtwo or Kyogre.

Sup3rn00b 04-07-2013 11:12 PM
IT LOOKS SO WEIRD. and it looks like its holding its own ****

Jester Lapse 04-07-2013 11:13 PM
Quote:
Posted by Sup3rn00b (Post 326709)
IT LOOKS SO WEIRD.
It's hands are grasping its breasts, of course it looks weird.

Talon 04-07-2013 11:22 PM
Quote:
Posted by Jester Lapse (Post 326702)
I refuse to accept them as legendaries. They hold no value (except latios and latias) and I refer to them as sub-legendaries because they are more or less of a filler to get more "legendary" pokemon in one game.

Yes, they are legendaries on the exterior, but they really miss the point of what getting a legendary was about, having a good backstory and being hard as hell to get. Like Mewtwo or Kyogre.
Lati@s was one of the hardest Pokémon to catch in the main series games. And what makes the Genie trio not legendary? Just because they're not a version mascot and/or in the first 151 doesn't make them "sub-legendary". They're legendaries, and they have genders.

Jester Lapse 04-07-2013 11:34 PM
http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/th...Uxie_anime.png

are these the people you are referring to?

Let me explain something, when I say sub-legendary, I mean the legendaries that are not exactly a part of the main story or have no real story at all. They are just there for the sake of having more than one legendary in the game at a time.

Latios and Latias are like the easiest legendaries to catch as of GEN5

Sorry, my views on legendaries don't match up with the actual definition. To me, they are like the demi gods of the gods.

Remorse 04-07-2013 11:40 PM
Pretty sure those are the lake guardian legendaries.
The Kami trio are the ones from Generation 5
http://www.anjelsyndicate.org/wp-con...rnate-Form.png


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:37 PM.
10 of 144 « First 6789 10 111213142060110 Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.