BF3 was built for casual players... I don't find anything hardcore about BF3 because it lacks alot in representation.. Im not gonna lie, the visuals look damn amazing... But the gameplay makes me wanna snore.. and with the BF3 campaign (which lasted for 4 hours and had a generic storyline), BF3 was a visual masterpiece which ended up in a somewhat ok multiplayer shooter that is fun when you play it in bursts...

CoD:Mw3 is not the same shooter you've been playing again and again! (I have the actual copy of the game). Once you ignore the crappy deja vu menu screen, the new features got my attention real good!

You had one awesome survival mode (Which you can bring three other friends along with for 3 times the fun) which is crazy! There was no menu shop by pressing start... Oh no... You had to run to one of three different boxes... the Air support shop, the weapon shop, and the perks shop... You unlock these by leveling up in survival mode which then you can use to continue fighting the most cruel of waves.. (Suicide Bombers, Juggernauts, Attack Choppers, Soldiers, Attack Dogs, Soldiers with C4, etc.)... Its intense!

The Multiplayer is somewhat ok but it had some impressive features... The new class system entirely changes the way you play from now on... and the Kill confirmed system now makes sure campers will have a hard time in MW3...

The campaign (which is 5 hours) pretty much followed the trilogy (UNLIKE BATTLEFIELD 3!) and is the michael bay of all shooters! EXPLOSIONS, EPIC GUNFIGHTS, CLIMATIC SCENES, INTENSE ACTION, AND A HUGE IN-CHARACTER DETAIL)...

Modern warfare 3 murders BF3 in every perspective except the visuals...
Do not take Modern warfare 3 for another plain shooter...

if it aint broke dont fix it

Beat the campaign. I liked it. See no reason to complain. Level 31 online so far. Liked it better than BF3.

I'm not saying they should adjust the way the game is played, just add new, good features.

I enjoy Call of Duty, but I can still see the problem with it, a problem that Activision is pretty damn vocal about: it's all about the money. The CEO of Activision pretty much said that he wanted to turn it into a yearly franchise because people will buy it. They also do it with all their other titles and eventually killed them.

Do I enjoy CoD? Yes. But you know what, I'd probably enjoy it for another year or two if they didn't release another version with updates that could have been done via patches. See, the problem is is that they will release a new version. Everyone goes "OGMOMFGOMFGOMFG" and go buy it, and the people who are aware of what's going on end up either being left behind(all your friends have MW3 now, enjoy Black Ops by your lonesome) or getting it. It's a ****ing harsh circle that is now happening on a yearly schedule.

Or break free from the cycle and buy another game, it's not as if everyone will only play MW3, for example, me and a good few friends are buying Skyrim (<3) instead of MW3.

Yes, in your example. But no, seriously, the people I bother to play with will indeed have much passion for playing any Call of Duty that comes out. And you know, it doesn't bother me that much, because in the end I still enjoy playing it with them anyways.

Yeah, that's extremely annoying in my opinion. Everyones going like "Omg I'm going to prestige and become number 1!" then the next thing you know a new Call of Duty comes out and they toss the old one aside. I wish it wasn't like that because they're going to run out of ideas eventually if they keep doing this. They also have Treyarch working on Call of Duty games so there's an estimated 2-3 Call of Duty games a year.

:dance: I GOT IT I GOT IT I GOT IT

They've been putting out one every November which is far less than your 2-3 a year statement. There's constant collaboration between the studios who work on the series. There's been MW (07), CoD5 (08), MW2 (09), BLOPS (10), and now MW3 (11). At least get your facts straight.

Sledgehammer Games, Infinity Ward, and a few people from Treyarch all contributed to Modern Warfare 3.

CoD is just the new FPS Madden.

Besides, both sides are getting ****ed by Activision and EA anyway.

Alright well not 2-3 games a year I was just going by guess, but I still think every of couple of years would be better then every year so people can really sync into the game and not have to worry about saving up for the new one that's released every year. That's just my opinion. I just hate ranking up and then a new game comes out and you need to rank up all over again.

I spent 8 hours playing it yesterday :) Survival FTW, I got to like round 30 on Resistance only using the Model 1887 and a Magnum .44.

Lvl 57 so far

I wanna start campaign. Looks fun, WW3

Lvl 66 now. Gets better as you go along