Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Chat (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Bobby Shmurda (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35779)

Nabu Lapse 05-26-2016 02:36 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Posted by Illusions (Post 708209)
What the hell, go to school.

Attachment 21707

Skyzer 05-26-2016 03:03 AM

Quote:

Posted by Crono (Post 708000)
LEL

You got me. That happened because I was moving sentences around.

Distorted_P2P 05-26-2016 03:30 AM

why does this happen to all my threads

just wanted to have a legitimate debate involving a dude who snitched on himself unknowingly

Skyzer 05-26-2016 05:15 AM

Quote:

Posted by Distorted_P2P (Post 708250)
why does this happen to all my threads

just wanted to have a legitimate debate involving a dude who snitched on himself unknowingly

He's an idiot. That's all there is to say.

Crono 05-26-2016 12:19 PM

Quote:

Posted by Skyzer (Post 708233)
You got me. That happened because I was moving sentences around.

happens to the best of us

PigParty 05-26-2016 12:28 PM

He couldn't (or at least shouldn't) even be charged if song lyrics are the only evidence. I'm sure they have talked to other people and built up more evidence than only song lyrics. I haven't followed the case, but I remember hearing a long time ago about someone's song lyrics admitting to a crime... I don't know if this is that exact case or not. I would also think the prosecutors would have a victim. Song lyrics themselves wouldn't get him convicted, let alone charged for a crime. That, and other evidence could, though. If he has ever said that his song lyrics are true or based on something that he did, then that could easily be used against him. Freedom of speech doesn't say that the speech someone does say (in any form of speech) cannot be used against them. It would actually be harder for the prosecutors - unless they had other credible evidence - to use that against him because the defense would have an easy defense against it.

Distorted_P2P 05-26-2016 12:50 PM

Quote:

Posted by PigParty (Post 708297)
He couldn't (or at least shouldn't) even be charged if song lyrics are the only evidence. I'm sure they have talked to other people and built up more evidence than only song lyrics. I haven't followed the case, but I remember hearing a long time ago about someone's song lyrics admitting to a crime... I don't know if this is that exact case or not. I would also think the prosecutors would have a victim. Song lyrics themselves wouldn't get him convicted, let alone charged for a crime. That, and other evidence could, though. If he has ever said that his song lyrics are true or based on something that he did, then that could easily be used against him. Freedom of speech doesn't say that the speech someone does say (in any form of speech) cannot be used against them. It would actually be harder for the prosecutors - unless they had other credible evidence - to use that against him because the defense would have an easy defense against it.

posted the indictment earlier in the thread, it's pretty interesting to read


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.