You both have good points

Lol

One candidate's a moron, the other one is corrupt.

Bernie Sanders has always been a political (and non-political) activist. Here's a picture of him marching with Martin Luther King Jr.

And here's him endorsing Rev. Jesse Jackson in 1988:


Oh and look at this, Bernie Sanders donated 4% of his income to charity, 8350$ out of his 205,000$. You know how much other candidates like Donald Trump donated? 10,000$ total in 7 YEARS. Who cares if Bernie isn't rich (even though he has double what you said) he's way more charitable.

dont feed the troll @distorted. if you need my patented Graalian Essentials: Ignorelist™ lemme kno

Funny. Isn't Distorted on that list?

To think that there was a time when Americans cared about corruption. Watergate was a big deal. Dozens of staffers were incarcerated and a president was impeached. Now we shrug it off saying "that's how it always was." People aren't bothered with this nowadays. How low will you stoop to get your preferred candidate in. What does that say about the States?

much easier to be a slacktivist. this is a problem in other countries too, not just the US.

i dont mind people being interested in politics, but the people who seem to know what theyre talking about get drowned out by sjw ******s and such.

What corruption? These emails are from after April when Sanders had already lost.

http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/wikile...egate-fec-jvf/

This is all well after Bernie's campaign sued the DNC, him breaking fundraising pledges and doing nothing for the party, and Bernie's campaign breach of Clinton's voter data. The race was effectively over - and he just wouldn't go away. Anyone saying this is "corruption" is looking at evidence that hasn't been leaked, yet.

Lost? He hadn't dropped out yet. He may very well have lost because of the momentum Hillary got. If Bernie wasn't treated fairly and the DNC favored Hillary, they could have changed the momentum which could be the reason he lost. You aren't seriously saying it doesn't matter? Bernie Sanders had the right to sue them, and that did not give the DNC the right to mistreat him. It's obvious you're biased toward Hillary, but you can't seriously believe it doesn't matter. Just because the emails may have been from "after April" doesn't have any affect on whether or not it was corrupt. It represents the corruption and divide in the government for how they twist things in order to push their agenda - no matter what the people want.

Explain how this isn't corruption within the DNC?
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4091
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11056

Even though it is corrupt, Sanders was not turning his campaign around from that point, just to put the nail in that coffin. You owe me $20 Yog I called it months ago when he still "had a chance".

The best part is that the moment Debbie quit the DNC, Clinton immediately hired her
After Benghazi and the emails, I don't even think she cares about her reputation anymore

Just shows how bad both candidates are - Trump praised Roger Ailles after he "stepped down" from Fox News.

nah "Distorted" is on it, I'm a different guy

Find it hilarious bern-tards support Bernie the weak boy sanders lol, dude proved last night he has no backbone and is unfit to lead this nation.