You win the award of having the worst summary of something I've wrote. Like wasn't even right.

"what you've just said... is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

so..no more blue and grey? I don't think I want the whole color scheme to be changed but ok

To be fair, it is kind of a hassle to have to read anything you write because every sentence starts with "like," you organize it into about 50 different unnecessary 1-2 sentence paragraphs, and you use references, false analogies, and other stuff that all in all just makes it a pain. Very rarely can someone get a clear translation of anything you've written.

New GMap No. 7 confirmed

Isn't it 8?

Or really 9 if you count the beach addition... And then 10 for the hotel... And then 10 if you count the Halloween stuff.

11 if you count the whole thing where they got rid of like 7 buildings for no reason...

@TWIZ

It's this thing called parallel structure.
It's this thing called emphasis.
It's this thing called rhythm.

Not only is it more grammatically correct to separate topics, personally I can't stand reading things without rhythm and I attempt to keep all of my writings under some sort of 4-5 or 6-7.

It's this thing called literature credits.
It's this thing called college.
It's this thing called having all of them.

#IKnowEnglish #YouDontKnowFormat
(as for the like thing, like is an actual transition. It shows similarity but a contrast. Personally I even use it on formal writing as it's really easy to set up emphasis with. For example, my prep for last year started with like "Like I have a lot of better things to do with my life than do this prep. Like I have a lot of friends that are probably lonely. Like I have tons of games just on my shelf. However, I refuse to fail." Got an A in the class. So shush before you actually take a class which explains modes of writing in depth... Plus like I've said, I attempt to write naturally. I type what I think in my head and I use a lot of likes.

Like "The I have a dream" speech started with I Have A Dream over 15 times. It started with "With" over 17 times. Its also written in fragments.

Try calling that masterpiece hard to read k.

Oh and for all you losers that are racist, that actually was a masterpiece. Did you know that whole speech wasnt planned and he recited and tweaked another one he said almost a week ago? For that amount of power to simply be off memory... That's goose bumps k. MLK Jr needs a writing award. No. He needs a WIPO)
(Yo like someone in game said "here have a WIPO". Honestly made my day.)


Let's bring this back on topic mk.

Notice how I do that. Unlike some people.

So like, just wondering- do y'all want a larger or smaller map?

I want a smaller one.

shadup nurd

I don't even bother to read any of his posts tbh

You think I don't know about parallel structure, emphasis, and rhythm? If you showed one of your posts to a college professor, he would point out about fifty thousand grammatical errors. Not only that, but he would actually look at your rhetorical techniques and say that it adds absolutely no emotional emphasis on what you write. It isn't rhythm, it's repetitive uselessness. It's almost eyestraining.

Oh, and if you've actually taken a class and gotten "all" of the credits, you've also probably learned about audience. Keep in mind that this is a forum where the majority of people probably aren't even in high school yet.

And if you are seriously trying to compare yourself to MLK Jr, please, just leave.

That's the rhythm I go for.

The emphasis is not on what I say.

Its how I say it.

Give my posts to a professor, I'm actually pretty certain they would be impressed as this is a forum which people have fun on and you don't necessarily attempt to do all the techniques.

What you call flaws, I call personality.

If we're talking about grammatical errors to personify the writer, you my friend have never read Stephen King.

I understand I write annoyingly. I intend to do so. Because again, this is still a game forum. And what's the funnest thing to do in game, or even in real life? To annoy the living hell out of people. Because it does not matter what I do today or tomorrow, it only matters if my life was done so I could always laugh. Because for all I know, once I die the universe dies with me. Yada yada yada, you don't read my full posts, yada yada yada, I've rephrased this seven times over.

If you do wish to say something which is easily overturned as writing in itself is all opinion and I prefer natural language over writing(this being said- dear microsoft- what ever happened to that spoken email service thing you were going to make...) as it's more personal(because frankly half of the people on these forums are boring and show no personality at all), make sure you actually GET BACK ONTO THE TOPIC.

Like I messaged peggyfiesta- it's this easy thing called writing one sentence. Tie it back to the actual topic so people can actually have a chance to write something progressive.

So like, while yall were making the tile set... Did y'all finally fix that tree bug... Lelz.

Ok anyways, i think zone needs more of a utopian feel, like cooler/chill colors, its brightness and cartoon-like appearence doesnt quite fit it. Darker cooler colors will allow us to add more illuminated structures and stuff, making it so its not bright because everything just happens to be bright, but brighter in places (lighted roadways, building, objects) to give off that "futuristic" feeling to it.

http://www.1wallpaperhd.com/wp-conte...201280x720.jpg

http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/files/bsg2_0.jpg

True

I like how in your photo you can see the other planets.

Little visual things like that go a long way.

My point is, you can't judge someone for misinterpreting what you wrote when you didn't even consider who your audience might be (which I assume you learned in your writing course). That's a logical fallacy, which I also assume you learned about in your writing course.

Lets drop the arguement and get back on topic

I agree, maybe those floating rock masses could be like "islands" on the gmap. I think skyworld should be floating over a venus-like planet. It would make sense when considering the dense lower atmosphere and the thinner earth-like upper atmosphere.