| Ghettoicedtea |
11-30-2017 03:10 AM |
Quote:
Posted by Areo
(Post 802470)
I didn’t say it was proof of collusion... I’m merely saying the story of Russian interference is not fake news. I’m not arguing about what it means, I’m saying that it happened.
|
Got any proof? James Comey didn't and got fired because of it and wanted more money.
Quote:
Posted by Areo
(Post 802470)
Also, the intelligence committee uses the phrase “high confidence” as in analytic confidence.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_confidence
“High confidence generally indicates judgments based on high-quality information, and/or the nature of the issue makes it possible to render a solid judgment. A “high confidence” judgment is not a fact or a certainty, however, and still carries a risk of being wrong” so I trust the judgement and what is implied.
|
So it's a hypothesis. Or an educated guess based on what will happen, or in this case, what did happen. There's been hearings, there's been everything already and there is still ZERO PROOF. If you make an accusation or a hypothesis, you need to prove it. Its all just words at this point, or, nothing.
Quote:
Posted by Areo
(Post 802470)
I’m not arguing about Hillary Clinton. I believe that her crimes and feelings of being “above the law” stand in plain sight, and we don’t need to bring them up in this conversation.
|
im not arguing about her either.
Quote:
Posted by Areo
(Post 802470)
Besides this, there is evidence of Russian troll accounts on Facebook posting political messages... that is clearly another country attempting to interfere with an election.
|
By that logic we should be going after all the people that started to talk about US politics and saying "vote Trump" or "vote Bernie" or "Vote Clinton" on twatter that are not US citizens. They clearly are influencing an election. But not the ILLEGAL immigrants and ARE NOT US citizens who can vote in US elections.
Quote:
Posted by Areo
(Post 802470)
I’ll leave this obvious bait statement alone, it has no real connection to what was being said. However, I will add one more statement to my previous one; when national estimates say that 75~ percent of individuals are in favor of Net Neutrality and we are still pushing toward a repeal I think that speaks for itself about how much we are represented.
|
75% according to whom? Lame stream main stream news networks? The Government? I haven't received any calls about my support for net neutrality. |
