| Talon |
07-05-2012 05:36 PM |
Quote:
Posted by Renegade1337
(Post 154455)
I dont understand how x.x, if it had 10 damage providing both bullets it it would take 5 shots, pbp is a 4 shot kill, pbp still is better, ive only seen one person wielding the ksg in a month, it was underpowered from the start ;(
|
Yes, and you also have to remember the KSG costs a little over half of the PBP. It isn't supposed to be as good as the PBP. It's like saying the AK should be buffed to make it as good as the BAR.
Quote:
Posted by romario786
(Post 155037)
the KSG gun still sucks.. end off even though snake you made some amendments to it, it still gets owned by a stupid AK47, snake, how about get 2 people to test the KSG, once holds a KSG the other holds a AK47, you will get your answer that the KSG gets owned by a dumb 2500 gun... so really....
75k compared to 2.5k gun, who will win the 2.5k gun... so is the KSG really worth it's price?
|
That's a horrible argument, seeing as it isn't the gun that decides the outcome of a gunfight. It's the wielder. If one knows how to use the KSG correctly, there shouldn't be any problems with it. Plus, the guns are in completely different classes. As Snake said, the KSG is a close quarters gun, which, if you use close quarters, will dominate the AK in CQC. If you're shooting the length of your screen, of course you aren't going to do good against a long-range sprayer.
THINK
Also, gun price to performance ratio isn't ever going to be propoortional. Nothing is. Ever. If a 2.5k gun as good as the AK had price-to-performance ratio proportional to an M4, the M4 would be exactly 50x better than the AK. The M4 in that case would have 400 damage.
You may sit down now.
|