Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Chat (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Another terror attack in England... (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39134)

Red 06-26-2017 02:35 AM

Quote:

Posted by MrSimons (Post 787791)
I'd say that in North America and Australia it is already a modern religion. Its pretty clear that at this point there is a large divide in Islamic values between parts of the globe.

it comes to how the people of Islam in Australia treat the normal Australian citizens, which is utter ****. There are plenty of nice Muslims I know but some are pretty disgusting in the way of attitude towards people.

It's just annoying to see them demanding things from our government based on the fact they're muslim, its ridiculous.

They abused Imam Tahwadii a muslim activist against Shariah law for being against shariah law, spitting at him and swearing at him in arabic in the streets of adelaide and sydney on a program called today tonight.

Ximithie 06-26-2017 07:51 PM

All the countries in Europe should divide like the UK wants too they would be much better off tbh like Germany and France so many attacks its mostly cause of the refugee crisis I'm not saying all of the incoming refugees are bad but some are every country should decide for them self not for Europe like they are currently doing.

PigParty 06-26-2017 10:53 PM

Quote:

Posted by Ximithie (Post 788087)
All the countries in Europe should divide like the UK wants too they would be much better off tbh like Germany and France so many attacks its mostly cause of the refugee crisis I'm not saying all of the incoming refugees are bad but some are every country should decide for them self not for Europe like they are currently doing.

I think the EU is a good idea in theory, but it never would have lasted. British people don't think of themselves as Europeans. They think of themselves as British. That's why it never would have worked. I live in Ohio, but I'm an American, and that's what makes all the difference. When a state dislikes a national law, we just have to put up with it, or fight it in court. But we all accept our national laws. European countries have no obligation to the EU like U.S. citizens have to America.

PumaD 06-27-2017 01:28 AM

Quote:

Posted by PigParty (Post 788104)
European countries have no obligation to the EU like U.S. citizens have to America.

Yes, they do too lol. On a side note, UK had a lot of other reasons to leave.

PigParty 06-27-2017 03:15 AM

Quote:

Posted by PumaD (Post 788133)
Yes, they do too lol. On a side note, UK had a lot of other reasons to leave.

how so? They don't have the same pride, ties, or nationalism to the EU like U.S. citizens do to America. We pledge allegiance to the United States. They pledge allegiance to their country; not the EU.

Sig. 06-27-2017 01:13 PM

Quote:

Posted by PigParty (Post 788145)
how so? They don't have the same pride, ties, or nationalism to the EU like U.S. citizens do to America. We pledge allegiance to the United States. They pledge allegiance to their country; not the EU.

https://europa.eu/european-union/law/application_en

PigParty 06-27-2017 04:45 PM

Quote:

Posted by Sig. (Post 788175)

Yea, so? They have laws and a system. That's not nationalism. Californians don't think of themselves as Californians. They're Americans. Can't say that about European countries. They're French, German, English, and so on. They choose to be in the EU. That's the difference. America had a war over states trying to leave America. The states make America. It's not just some contract we choose to be in until we no longer want to.

Clown 06-27-2017 05:07 PM

Yeah admittedly a lot of us pledge allegiance to our country, all the EU did was drain us and command what our people should do. Being one of the only countries in the EU that actually did abide by the EU's policies really wasn't a favourable thing for our people - (See France banning the Burkha, which a majority of British people had agreed with, the EU was against it yet France still have not received a penalty as a result of their action)

Sardon 06-27-2017 10:29 PM

The EU is great towards germany and france however destroyed the economies of many countries including Italy and Greece.
Most countries would be better off,the only benefit the EU granted was the fact that for once European nations didn't fight one another(with the exeption of the incident in the 90s)

This thread is pretty much as useful as the U.Nin solving any of our issues

Sig. 06-28-2017 12:23 AM

Quote:

Posted by Sardon (Post 788219)
The EU is great towards germany and france however destroyed the economies of many countries including Italy and Greece.
Most countries would be better off,the only benefit the EU granted was the fact that for once European nations didn't fight one another(with the exeption of the incident in the 90s)

This thread is pretty much as useful as the U.Nin solving any of our issues

Yea Greece totally did not **** itself with their ****ty bureaucracy. I don't know why you're talking if you know nothing about the issue(s).

Weeno 06-28-2017 03:33 AM

I get banned, come back and see that this thread is alive

MrSimons 06-28-2017 05:54 AM

Quote:

Posted by Sardon (Post 788219)
The EU is great towards germany and france however destroyed the economies of many countries including Italy and Greece.
Most countries would be better off,the only benefit the EU granted was the fact that for once European nations didn't fight one another(with the exeption of the incident in the 90s)

This thread is pretty much as useful as the U.Nin solving any of our issues

Well to be fair Italy and Greece wouldn't be much better off without the EU.

Quote:

Posted by Weeno (Post 788246)
I get banned, come back and see that this thread is alive

Guess you should've been banned longer?

MBK 06-28-2017 03:20 PM

Quote:

Posted by Colin (Post 786162)
Criticizing a religion doesn't make you racist bimbo

You should learn to read buddy, let me give you a few examples:



“They ask you about fighting during the sacred months. Tell them, fighting therein is a great sin but a greater sin is to prevent mankind from following the way of Allah, to disbelieve in him.” 2:217



“Kill them wherever you find them and drive them out from where they drove you out. Persecution is worse than slaughter.” 2:191



“When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks.” 47:4



“When your Lord revealed to the angels, ‘Truly I am with you. So, keep firm those who have believed. I will strike terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved. So, strike them at the necks and cut off their fingers.’” 8:12



“Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has made one superior to the other and because they spend to support them from their means. Therefore, righteous women are obedient and they guard in the husband’s absence what Allah orders them to guard. And, as to those women from whom you fear disobedience, give them a warning, send them to separate beds, and beat them.” 4:34



“Oh you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you and let them find harshness in you.” 9:123



“Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. Those who follow Him are merciful to one another but harsh to the disbeliever.” 48:29



“They wish that you would reject faith as they have rejected faith unless that you would all be equal. So, don’t take protectors from them unless they emigrate in the way of Allah but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them.” 4:89



"Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority" 3:151



"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement" 5:33

Should I keep going? These are just a few of the violent versus, haven't even gotten to the aggressive stuff regarding women/homosexuals and others aside from the quote in there about beating women who don't obey you.

Hey did i not answer to all these accusations when some other **** said the same thing... i think that was Zetectic. Cmon Penguin i thought you were a sensible dude. You seemed to have joined the same islamophobic group you used to shut down once.

Quote:

Posted by Red (Post 787367)
Wick, you're the same person who called me racist when I criticised some of islams core beliefs and still seem to have that ideology that "anyone who says bad things about my religion is racist"


Islam isn't a race first of all, Second of all I encourage Colin and anyone else to avoid arguing with both wick and saeed because both of these ignorant morons will get upset and continue to reply saying "you're wrong" without any context.

It's the same as jimbo vs sarah/dark if they're wrong in the fact department they will just say "you're wrong" without context.



TO BE VERY CLEAR, Nobody here is an "islamaphobe" you're just sensitive and ignorant and refuse to bring any factual or true information to an argument.


Kosiris himself lives in Saudi Arabia and hes not tossing out the race card or criticizing others, hes contributing to the conversation which is what saeed refuses to do.


Pigparty is also somebody I wouldn't waste time on, besides the whole ignorant banter he spits out he also refuses to value your opinion and hits the quote button without actually reading what you've said and understanding it. It's the same as saeed. They fail to read or even bother trying to interpret what anyone here is trying to say and just want to start drama.




You basically summed up everything anyone could reply to you with:


The problem with islam is that todays "sjw" group just refuses to read up on what they're actually "defending"

As I said 3 times over, you are replying randomly without actually trying to read or understand what colin is saying, you just have that ****ty mentality you display on iclassic and on the iclassic subforum where if you don't like what someone is saying you'll quickly whip something up and post it without thinking.



"I don't fast" - saeed

Basically lying about being muslim, or he just isn't informed into what his religion states he must do.

I'll give you your context ya donkey. come at me

Kosiris 06-29-2017 01:47 PM

Quote:

Posted by MBK (Post 788293)
I'll give you your context ya donkey. come at me

Alright what's the context to this:
الرِّجَالُ قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ اللَّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَىٰ بَعْضٍ وَبِمَا أَنفَقُوا مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِمْ ۚ فَالصَّالِحَاتُ قَانِتَاتٌ حَافِظَاتٌ لِّلْغَيْبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ اللَّهُ ۚ وَاللَّاتِي تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَاهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِي الْمَضَاجِعِ وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ ۖ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلَا تَبْغُوا عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا (34)

Tafsir:
يقول تعالى : ( الرجال قوامون على النساء ) أي : الرجل قيم على المرأة ، أي هو رئيسها وكبيرها والحاكم عليها ومؤدبها إذا اعوجت ( بما فضل الله بعضهم على بعض ) أي : لأن الرجال أفضل من النساء ، والرجل خير من المرأة; ولهذا كانت النبوة مختصة بالرجال وكذلك الملك الأعظم; لقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم : " لن يفلح قوم ولوا أمرهم امرأة " رواه البخاري من حديث عبد الرحمن بن أبي بكرة ، عن أبيه وكذا منصب القضاء وغير ذلك .

G Fatal 06-29-2017 07:30 PM

You guys should make a thread based on topic of terrorism/Isis/religions..

Crono 06-30-2017 04:29 PM

Quote:

Posted by G Fatal (Post 788451)
You guys should make a thread based on topic of terrorism/Isis/religions..

b b but isis has nuthin 2 do wit religion

5hift 06-30-2017 06:02 PM

Quote:

Posted by G Fatal (Post 788451)
You guys should make a thread based on topic of terrorism/Isis/religions..

Quote:

Posted by Pokki (Post 788591)
yay another completely pointless thread to start arguments

No controversial topics allowed.

G Fatal 06-30-2017 07:07 PM

Quote:

Posted by 5hift (Post 788608)
No controversial topics allowed.

It’s okay hape has graal censorship under control :giggle:

MBK 07-03-2017 06:28 AM

Quote:

Posted by Kosiris (Post 788424)
Alright what's the context to this:
الرِّجَالُ قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ اللَّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَىٰ بَعْضٍ وَبِمَا أَنفَقُوا مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِمْ ۚ فَالصَّالِحَاتُ قَانِتَاتٌ حَافِظَاتٌ لِّلْغَيْبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ اللَّهُ ۚ وَاللَّاتِي تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَاهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِي الْمَضَاجِعِ وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ ۖ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلَا تَبْغُوا عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا (34)

Tafsir:
يقول تعالى : ( الرجال قوامون على النساء ) أي : الرجل قيم على المرأة ، أي هو رئيسها وكبيرها والحاكم عليها ومؤدبها إذا اعوجت ( بما فضل الله بعضهم على بعض ) أي : لأن الرجال أفضل من النساء ، والرجل خير من المرأة; ولهذا كانت النبوة مختصة بالرجال وكذلك الملك الأعظم; لقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم : " لن يفلح قوم ولوا أمرهم امرأة " رواه البخاري من حديث عبد الرحمن بن أبي بكرة ، عن أبيه وكذا منصب القضاء وغير ذلك .

Men should take care of their wives, get them food and supplies for survival, take care of them, not hit them, spend a part of their earning on them etc. This also mentions a scenario in which The Holy Prophet(PBUH) wanted to cut off a man's hands for hitting his wife.

Link to the tafsir please

Sardon 07-03-2017 12:28 PM

Quote:

Posted by MrSimons (Post 788256)
Well to be fair Italy and Greece wouldn't be much better off without the EU.

No,Because of the euro conversion the price of things went up 40% while wages were not raised to balance things out.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.