Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   GraalOnline Classic (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Is it possible? (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31095)

Marouke 09-03-2015 05:06 PM

Is it possible?
 
Is there anyway I could get my stats reset on my account or no?

Neil 09-03-2015 05:08 PM

No.

SouthernZombie* 09-03-2015 05:12 PM

If you boost I think.

Craftz 09-03-2015 05:23 PM

For what reason would you want to reset your stats?

Albie 09-03-2015 05:24 PM

Quote:

Posted by SouthernZombie* (Post 610848)
If you boost I think.

Sometimes they just reset your wins so you're left with your losses only

Marouke 09-03-2015 05:39 PM

I want to reset my spars I have 14000-9500 that's such a bad ratio because I transferred a lot of my noob accounts that had negative records couple years ago I have around 4000 losses if not more in there for nothing :/

Admiral 09-03-2015 05:54 PM

Just do that thing people do where they write in their statuses a new w/l ratio

Droid 09-03-2015 05:56 PM

The people at toonslab couldn't do it even if they wanted to, not possible.
Officially

SouthernZombie* 09-03-2015 06:20 PM

May want to just start a new account.

Tyree 09-03-2015 06:35 PM

Why should stats matter, put a new w/l ratio in your status like Admiral said above^^^

Areo 09-03-2015 07:25 PM

Just don't care about ratio. Nobody is going to be so uptight about it, you're positive. Or at least, most won't be

Aguzo 09-03-2015 07:38 PM

Ratios are worthless, unless you are going 20:1 or 50:1. Then it's pointlessly worthless.

eevee2 09-03-2015 11:01 PM

Quote:

Posted by Marouke (Post 610853)
I want to reset my spars I have 14000-9500 that's such a bad ratio because I transferred a lot of my noob accounts that had negative records couple years ago I have around 4000 losses if not more in there for nothing :/

I've been waiting to say this...
NOBODY CARE ABOUT RATIO

SouthernZombie* 09-03-2015 11:25 PM

Nobody care

Sardon 09-03-2015 11:36 PM

Quote:

Posted by eevee2 (Post 610912)
I've been waiting to say this...
NOBODY CARE ABOUT RATIO

my thread

Ratios are for looks
I can beat tons of positives and im negative .

Its just that a large majority of positive sparrers warm up on seperate acounts with negative ratios and then perform on their main.

eevee2 09-03-2015 11:56 PM

In that case why transfer in the first place?

Basi 09-03-2015 11:58 PM

Quote:

Posted by Marouke (Post 610853)
I want to reset my spars I have 14000-9500 that's such a bad ratio because I transferred a lot of my noob accounts that had negative records couple years ago I have around 4000 losses if not more in there for nothing :/

3000-4000

you dont hear me complaining. now go away

Red 09-04-2015 12:24 AM

A ratio is there for a reason, to show how consistent you are.
The only way to "improve it" is to win Consistently

tl;dr ratio does have a point to it

Zetectic 09-04-2015 12:43 AM

yea marc bro i feel ya, its gonna be little hypocrite coming outta my mouth since i care about my ratio. i worked hard on fixing my ratio ever since i got outta negative ratio from the past. at least im proud to say i didn't selective spar in the side room. i sometimes get tough challengers and i lose a lot, but i still stay and take on them.

when i look at others, i don't look at their stats no more. i've seen many ppl with 10-3 ratio and over; they can't even beat me, stats are just a joke now. we really gotta reset everyones stat and make the blind matching for real. why do we even disallow spars in the other locations? we did it to prevent boosting. but boosting is happening in the battle arena. these people lose once twice, they leave. come back whenever the hard ones are gone.

adding lil more. i think i have a fun fact about main streak room:
except people like sarah and other few. most top tiers streak room sparrers have average ratio of 3-1.

Red 09-04-2015 01:42 AM

Quote:

Posted by Zetectic (Post 610941)
yea marc bro i feel ya, its gonna be little hypocrite coming outta my mouth since i care about my ratio. i worked hard on fixing my ratio ever since i got outta negative ratio from the past. at least im proud to say i didn't selective spar in the side room. i sometimes get tough challengers and i lose a lot, but i still stay and take on them.

when i look at others, i don't look at their stats no more. i've seen many ppl with 10-3 ratio and over; they can't even beat me, stats are just a joke now. we really gotta reset everyones stat and make the blind matching for real. why do we even disallow spars in the other locations? we did it to prevent boosting. but boosting is happening in the battle arena. these people lose once twice, they leave. come back whenever the hard ones are gone.

adding lil more. i think i have a fun fact about main streak room:
except people like sarah and other few. most top tiers streak room sparrers have average ratio of 3-1.

As I said a ratio is to show how consistent you are, look at sarah for example 75000-10000 this shows that that she consistently wins.

People need to understand that there is a spar ratio on your profile for a reason there is absolutely no point in getting rid of it, the only reason I see people wanting it gone is because they are self concious about the losses that follow after their wins and the only way to make this look "better" is to go on long winning streaks using any room even the side rooms will do.

Chun 09-04-2015 01:47 AM

All of you criticizing about people who want to have a better ratio are a bunch of wannabes. It does not make u look any better at sparring. People want better stats to have a better look in their profile both for themselves and others, same reason as people who upload heads/bodies. Yet I dont see any of you guys criticizing about upload threads saying "no one cares about your look, it is the inside that matters".

super kurosaki 09-04-2015 01:55 AM

Im 20,000-9,000 lol who care suck it up

Zetectic 09-04-2015 02:31 AM

Quote:

Posted by OG (Post 610968)
As I said a ratio is to show how consistent you are, look at sarah for example 75000-10000 this shows that that she consistently wins.

People need to understand that there is a spar ratio on your profile for a reason there is absolutely no point in getting rid of it, the only reason I see people wanting it gone is because they are self concious about the losses that follow after their wins and the only way to make this look "better" is to go on long winning streaks using any room even the side rooms will do.

it is consistent when we all are playing it fair. it is inconsistent because people are cheating aka boosting their stat. that's not a recognizable achievement at all.

Why do you think Kaios, Sardon, Marc complaining about this? bc most of people in game are judging them by their stat. how do you know? people on a new account selective sparred, and then get recruited by decent guilds. ???

We better come up with a new solution. We should just replace W-L to seasonal & total spar score. That's way more accurate. i mean think about it, there's plenty of old sparrers hasn't sparred in ages. if u put them up against new highest sparrers will they perform the same? no, it's very inaccurate. if they are seeking for some 'achievement recognition'-> total spar score will cover that for u.
|
v
hey look. Now you beat noobies, you won't get any points for it.
to prevent Pro sparrers sparring on an Alternative accounts. I think we need to make a room in the Battle Arena where only noobies can spar. noobies have to spar 500 times to join the real sparring. I chose the number 500, becuz by the time you spar 500 times you definitely know what you are doing, 500 is not a low number. so should be good.

i wrote too much ***. point is, there's a flaw in the spar system.
marc doesn't have a low ratio, it's just people who boosted made him look bad.

Red 09-04-2015 02:44 AM

Quote:

Posted by Zetectic (Post 610995)
it is consistent when we all are playing it fair. it is inconsistent because people are cheating aka boosting their stat. that's not a recognizable achievement at all.

Why do you think Kaios, Sardon, Marc complaining about this? bc most of people in game are judging them by their stat. how do you know? people on a new account selective sparred, and then get recruited by decent guilds. ???

We better come up with a new solution. We should just replace W-L to seasonal & total spar score. That's way more accurate. i mean think about it, there's plenty of old sparrers hasn't sparred in ages. if u put them up against new highest sparrers will they perform the same? no, it's very inaccurate. if they are seeking for some 'achievement recognition'-> total spar score will cover that for u.
|
v
hey look. Now you beat noobies, you won't get any points for it.
to prevent Pro sparrers sparring on an Alternative accounts. I think we need to make a room in the Battle Arena where only noobies can spar. noobies have to spar 500 times to join the real sparring. I chose the number 500, becuz by the time you spar 500 times you definitely know what you are doing, 500 is not a easy number for most of us.

No.
The only reason Kaios, Sardon and Marc happen to find it unfair is because they're self concious about their statistics and are too self centred to realise that if they actually won spars consistently they wouldn't have a ratio which is negative or something along the lines of 20000-19000 (kaios) or 14000-9000 (marc). The ratio "system" is not broken whatsoever its been the same since it was introduced and it hasn't been changed since (besides the 2 different leader boards)

Blaming losses on delay, lag or crappy server quality is what leads to this sort of thing, at some point you'll need to realise that winning more often = a better ratio.

Quote:

Posted by Zetectic (Post 610995)
it is inconsistent because people are cheating aka boosting their stat. that's not a recognizable achievement at all.

there's a flaw in the spar system.
marc does not have a low ratio, it's just people who boosted made him look bad.

A player who has "boosted" generally has no clue how to spar, Boosting is near impossible now that sparring is more popular and every room besides the fb and idev room are populated - Side rooming is not "boosting" it is a quick spar other players who you don't know are queing as well.

So a "booster" makes others look bad? its the other way around.

Sardon 09-04-2015 02:48 AM

Quote:

Posted by OG (Post 610999)
No.
The only reason Kaios, Sardon and Marc happen to find it unfair is because they're self concious about their statistics and are too self centred to realise that if they actually won spars consistently they wouldn't have a ratio which is negative or something along the lines of 20000-19000 (kaios) or 14000-9000 (marc). The ratio "system" is not broken whatsoever its been the same since it was introduced and it hasn't been changed since (besides the 2 different leader boards)

Blaming losses on delay, lag or crappy server quality is what leads to this sort of thing, at some point you'll need to realise that winning more often = a better ratio.


The reason negatives are negatives is because they do not do anything to become positive they just spar and do what they can and improve like that

Just because someone spars 100 noobs in a row and wins continuously does not mean they have improved

Your statistics depend on your device,Location and if you boost

Becoming positive usualy requires some sort of stradegy
For example boosting,vpn,selective sparring, using a nub acount to get unrusted.

Red 09-04-2015 02:50 AM

Quote:

Posted by Sardon (Post 611006)
Becoming positive usualy requires some sort of stradegy
For example boosting,vpn,selective sparring, using a nub acount to get unrusted.

or just get good and win spars?

Sardon 09-04-2015 02:54 AM

Quote:

Posted by Zetectic (Post 610995)
it is consistent when we all are playing it fair. it is inconsistent because people are cheating aka boosting their stat. that's not a recognizable achievement at all.

Why do you think Kaios, Sardon, Marc complaining about this? bc most of people in game are judging them by their stat. how do you know? people on a new account selective sparred, and then get recruited by decent guilds. ???

We better come up with a new solution. We should just replace W-L to seasonal & total spar score. That's way more accurate. i mean think about it, there's plenty of old sparrers hasn't sparred in ages. if u put them up against new highest sparrers will they perform the same? no, it's very inaccurate. if they are seeking for some 'achievement recognition'-> total spar score will cover that for u.
|
v
hey look. Now you beat noobies, you won't get any points for it.
to prevent Pro sparrers sparring on an Alternative accounts. I think we need to make a room in the Battle Arena where only noobies can spar. noobies have to spar 500 times to join the real sparring. I chose the number 500, becuz by the time you spar 500 times you definitely know what you are doing, 500 is not a low number. so should be good.

i wrote too much ***. point is, there's a flaw in the spar system.
marc doesn't have a low ratio, it's just people who boosted made him look bad.

You are right Negatives are judged by their stats
I seriesed the leader of gold when I was a serious sparrer (late 2014)
He beat me twice I beat him like 10 times.
I did it to get into gold for the gst
he refused to give me tag because I was negative.

Lag caps and spar monitors would really help
And getting rid of those kids who rage after every spar.

Red 09-04-2015 02:55 AM

Quote:

Posted by Sardon (Post 611009)
You are right Negatives are judged by their stats
I seriesed the leader of gold when I was a serious sparrer (late 2014)
He beat me twice I beat him like 10 times.
I did it to get into gold for the gst
he refused to give me tag because I was negative.

Lag caps and spar monitors would really help
And getting rid of those kids who rage after every spar.

please

Sardon 09-04-2015 02:57 AM

Quote:

Posted by OG (Post 611007)
or just get good and win spars?

as usual you cannot comprehend how negativity works

Just go somewere newr the server where you can get 80 ms and you might understand how taking hits is like.

Quote:

Posted by OG (Post 611010)
please

I used to spar everyday for hours
I concider that serious I dont know what you do
Maybe zet can find some Of the gst videos of the fall gst

Red 09-04-2015 03:12 AM

Quote:

Posted by Sardon (Post 611011)
as usual you cannot comprehend how negativity works

Just go somewere newr the server where you can get 80 ms and you might understand how taking hits is like.



I used to spar everyday for hours
I concider that serious I dont know what you do
Maybe zet can find some Of the gst videos of the fall gst

Started 300-500
-insert normal delay makes me lose excuse-
On my way to 10k I was getting 250-300 wins a day

Not going to keep replying because obviously you don't understand
winning consistently = a good looking ratio (barely any losses compared to wins)
delay or lag = no excuse.

Zetectic 09-04-2015 03:30 AM

Quote:

Posted by OG (Post 610999)
No.
The only reason Kaios, Sardon and Marc happen to find it unfair is because they're self concious about their statistics and are too self centred to realise that if they actually won spars consistently they wouldn't have a ratio which is negative or something along the lines of 20000-19000 (kaios) or 14000-9000 (marc). The ratio "system" is not broken whatsoever its been the same since it was introduced and it hasn't been changed since (besides the 2 different leader boards)

wtf? they're self conscious and self centered??? if anything, the society has affected them.
they happen to find it unfair bc society didn't treat them equally.

Quote:

Posted by OG (Post 610999)
A player who has "boosted" generally has no clue how to spar, Boosting is near impossible now that sparring is more popular and every room besides the fb and idev room are populated - Side rooming is not "boosting" it is a quick spar other players who you don't know are queing as well.

So a "booster" makes others look bad? its the other way around.

really don't wanna call anyone out. but boosting is very possible and ppl who have done it know it is boosting.
they sparred in the side spar room, i was there. i beat them on purpose, they left calling me names.
they came back the moment i was gone from the game.

the appearance of 'high ratio' sparrers did lower the class of casual sparrers.
in 2013, 3000-2000 was recognized as a decent sparrer.
nowadays, when we see someone who has 3000-2000 first thing that comes in my mind is 'they probably suck'.
why? i can find bunch of 1000-200 guys looking for the gst. in my mind without a doubt if these two fight each other 1000-200 guy will probably win.
even though 1000-200 guy sparred in the side room and 3000-2000 guy sparred in the mixed room. there's a big difference.

Quote:

Posted by OG (Post 611020)
"society" dude they lost spars its their fault.

Is this another way of saying, hey u ****ed up when u are noob and it's your fault.
now go make a second account and quit complaining?? just become one of those fake junkies?

Red 09-04-2015 03:37 AM

Quote:

Posted by Zetectic (Post 611018)
wtf? they're self conscious and self centered??? if anything, the society has affected them.
they happen to find it unfair bc society didn't treat them equally.

"society" dude they lost spars its their fault.

Zetectic 09-04-2015 05:05 AM

I get what you are saying tho. you want Sardon to be like Sarah and overcome his challenge, fix the spar ratio by winning a lot just like U did. but he was a noob, he was negative by a thousand, not 200. that's too much work to just blame on them.u should be proud of people like pride, leaf, austin, bob, male, sardon, kaios, marc. they are the ones who made through crazy challenges.

i would love to see U get on Running Farts account? he's negative by -4000. let me watch u make it positive. that's not just work, it'd be a hell of challenge. and you say cus they didn't win enough, they are being self centered and self conscious. well lemme see if any good gst guilds wants a negative 4000 guy in.

Alright so it's like this. U and ur friend take a school courses. u both messed up ur first quarter. Life went on after the first semester ur friend decides to retake that course to fix his avg up. Is it his fault for doing this? Hell nah. He spent his own time and money to do this. He deserved it. But can i blame u for doing bad at the first quarter? No. It's really nobody's fault dawg. Ppl make own choices. U dont just go around and say u shouldve done bettet in the first quarter. Cmon withit

Mangsi 09-04-2015 05:31 AM

They could implement the code that's on Zone to reset your spars.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.