![]() |
Graal Rumors
I hear that the GST will be combined into one division. What I mean is that there may be no more mixed and idevice divisions for gst, just one plain gst for ALL devices. Is dis true?
|
Quote:
Although it would be interesting to see the best idev teams beat every pc team that isn't Alumni/ULTRA |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The same question can be raised about pking, bking and sparring contributing to the 'NGS.' I don't think Fp4 has publicly confirmed any of this. All unlikely hypotheticals imo |
If they just wanted to make it a single tournament and it had no correlation with the NGS then they wouldn't be waiting all this time to release it when NGS is out.
I'm just gunna guess you haven't read any of the NGS threads, the roster size is being increased and a points system is being added where each individual member can contribute points, kicking members/using temporary members will bring some form of punishment (losing points most likely) as the whole point is to promote guild loyalty and overall activity in the game outside of towering and guild dedication. There's no other reason they would be changing the guild system, and taking this long to do so. |
Haven't read that thread.
It's an unofficial forum and half of the ideas that they post won't be implemented. I'm positive you can find other examples. -2015: Spoiler
|
I'd say their word is official considering they develop the game lol, who's to say GST hats won't be removed come NGS?
NGS had been on the update queue before that post was made, he never provided a specific date. Like I said, if there was absolutely no correlation between NSG and the single 64-team tournament they wouldn't be waiting to release it alongside NGS. |
Why the GST should be left untouched when the NGS is implemented:
-Would be lopsided and the same guild would take home the 1st place points every season... -Not every guild member is deserving of the 1st place points in a guild that wins. -Since guild loyalty is promoted and you can't recruit outsiders to improve, the same outcome will occur. -No g-sparrer that isn't already top 10-20 has improved in 2 years, so recruiting would be necessary- you then get punished for that? -GS activeness would drop from GST month to GST week. No reward=no motivation. -5/25 (5/50?) members can actually spar? lol fun -The GST right now would still be more fun than the NGS (in the long term.) No need for change Quote:
|
25 vs 25, make it happen
|
The most rational explanation for combining the tournaments is so that NGS guilds don't feel pressured to recruit 14 out of 50? roster spots dedicating to a tournament that happens four times a year. However, I feel like having only 7 out of 50? participating in a GST is going to create a weird GST atmosphere anyway. 43 other people aren't going to be humble enough to just sit out, so it's either going to encourage new and temporary guilds specifically for the GST (which is the exact problem the NGS should be fixing) or it's going to leave people feeling unhappy. I'm not really sure how the best way to handle it would be.
|
Quote:
|
Graal rumors:
-Carly is a man -Doublelift is a homosexual -Austin Koga Aka Rainmaker became depressed and almost took his own life after losing iDev gst with Grvty round 1 against 4 negative sparrers |
Gst shouldn't be linked with the NGS, they shouldn't make "guild points" as a reward for gst. Otherwise, half of those "50" players gonna be gsing in belle/ba which will effect the daily points of the guild. Also, it's going to be awkward when you only pick 7 members even tho some others practiced in ba/belle too. We should just stick to our gst guilds and the rewards should stay the same. Plus, this will make less gst guilds submissions since there will be only few NGS guilds with 50 members (you can only submit one team) I doubt you will get 64 submissions. Allowing the NGS guilds to submit 2 teams at once could also be an issue, because obviously you'll have the strong team and the weak team. But it's going to be better than having one submission from each guild. You can place the first submission in the first 32 guilds brackets and the second submission in the other 32 guilds brackets.
Edit: sticking to 2 gsts ( idev and mixed) will have the same result/effects as submitting two teams in one guild for one Gst. |
You could enter without having 50 members, just being awarded points would be useless.
They would of looked at this from every angle and found something that made sense and worked well. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
doesn't matter all of this was supposed to happen in january 2016 and we're still talking about it like it's coming out next week
|
Colin as someone who doesn't participate in GST, you have a tendency to pretend you are experienced in itīs development. Competition is evolving naturally, you canīt force who will take the belt
It do solve things, if NGS guilds and GST guilds were separated and yet you can still gain points to your NGS guild by guild sparring. It isn't complicated, why ruin something that barely needs to be fixed? and this way almost everyone will acknowledge NGS Quote:
|
Quote:
My whole post isn't even regarding GST as a whole, just how GST could work with the NGS primarily focusing on the NGS aspect, which is common sense and not something you need several belts to understand so I don't understand your post at all. We aren't here to debate whether or not it's going to happen, it's been stated it will so all I'm doing is trying to explain how the changes aren't as bad as they are claiming. Quote:
Your guild deserves the points if they win, nothing unfair about that. |
props on all this new guild system ideas, again who's making the decisions here primary sparrers or staff. :giggle:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Without a solution like this a guild would want to keep the 43 members that aren't on the team out of the tournament in case they were to lose to them. Having 43 members sit out of the GST seems like a disgusting reality to me, and something that would kinda ruin the culture around the GST. But this solution, the donation, seems like it would solve all of those issues. As a leader you would want to have as many members as you can compete, to increase your chances of winning the prize. Temporary tags would still be created, but that is unavoidable if you want to not destroy competition in its current format. However, this could suffer from arguments of who the points should go to (I would imagine that choice would be made pre-tournament, though) Another option could be to have to the individual members earn points, and not the tags they use. So the 7 winning members would get to choose where their points go, instead of having all the points be allocated altogether. This would remove the possibility of disputes and arguments over which guild gets the points. My only concerns would be that, in this option, guilds could have members forfeit because the opposing team has more members of their actual NGS guild than they do. Has anyone else come up with ideas for a solution to the participation issue? |
I need to see a 1v25 comeback
|
Graal Rumors: Xor fired Lollipop because she dumped him???
|
graal rumours: rufus rigged gst so northern sign would win
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No need to call Colin out, he's raising valid points and creating a healthy debate (until you brought you're cancerous attitude here) |
graals free to install but its also free to uninstall
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
ahh when I've only ever done one gst (mixed, for fun with friends) and do better than Jimbo has for his "5-6" attempts
I think we'll have to wait until the change happens to fully understand it, it could even have rules like requiring a certain number of Mixed/iDevice players, idk, we don't have an idea of how it works until it's out you could enter with any guild, and I can see that happening, but no one's sure if hats will be discontinued or not, will just be about winning rights and the belt I guess, which I'm sure most active GSers would love even without a hat |
Quote:
Quote:
The only thing wrong with the GST is how literally every guild recruits outsiders in order to gain points. The most suitable way to fix this would be implementing some system that only allows core and sub members to gain points for the guild. Then again this is unfair for the guilds that had to disband and recreate a guild because their points were insufficient when sparring with cores... |
Quote:
Almost everyone who would actually win is in an NGS guild though, and were recruited as sparrers, so it wouldn't bother the guilds if those people entered. |
Quote:
Quote:
(I'm not including you in this for reasons) I'm curious dark, do you actually think male or vis will ever beat the team you used for 7ives, at this point you're farming belts from idiots who use a different core every gst. (sounds familiar) |
Quote:
-If I wasn't on 7ives in their first win, averaging 9 hits vs Male idk if they advance to the finals. Anyways its a team effort, stay jealous -Red's obviously salty that he hasn't placed once as a core in how many years? I guess riding prime for apostles 3rd place sub hats is satisfying lol |
If guilds have 50 members then guilds should also be able to register multiple teams for the same tournament. Then each guild could have potentially 7 different teams(if their guild score qualifies for GST).
Example: say BlackGuard does GST, Primetime + his Sith friends would register Blackguard and then they have the option to add 1 of 7 teams. the first team added will be called BlackGuard by default, then if they add more teams they would have to give the team a name that isnt already a guild registered for GST. BlackGuard could then have 7 teams (example) #1BlackGuard(inco idevice team?) #2Sith(PC Blackguard members) #3 BG Pkers(pkers from blackguard who are interested in doing gst) #4 BG BKers(black guard bkers who are interested in doing gst) ect ect Therefore if one guild qualifies for GST, then 7 teams from that guild are technically qualified aswell. If one of those teams wins they can Announce "BlackGuards' Sith has won the GST". I think its a good idea but everybody on graalians can suck my nuts because you're gunna disagree with anything I have to say lmao |
Make use of the war room in the arena...25 v 25 or 50 v 50. Best guild wins.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Just give the winning guild the points and the people who partcipated and placed/won the gst a hat tbh |
In what kind of normal question do you call people "idiots" lol?
Anyones capable of winning |
Quote:
|
Graal Rumors
There was a rumor that a new guild system would be released soon!
|
*names thread Graal Rumors in a subforum for a specific graal server*
*the thread becomes another argument about sparring and gst* |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
yeah the title needs to be 100% accurate because we're all incapable of reading the opening post of the thread and just want to complain about the sparring community every chance we get
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Wow graal tumors
|
graal's just one big meme tbh
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.