Mp40 & M3
 

Most of you have heard the m3 has gotten a minor 'buff' in damage, well i was thinking maybe they could buff the mp40 since it is more expensive and barely used.

Well, after the m3 situation(and shotgun equation) gets settled, then ask about the mp40. I completely agree.

The MP40 got buffed, its like an AK with a bigger clip. I don't think it merits the 2,500 -> 10,000 price jump though. It needs a little more. Perhaps moving-while-shooting capabilities in exchange for a slightly slower sleep rate.

I barely use my mp40, lol. if its up at 10k, I think it should have more maneuverability and better accuracy.

It needs to be better. AK is better than it at 1500... i Think thats how much it is

mp40 got speed buff

the speed buff doesn't really help me when i'm sparring because i move alot.... i wish they made they made it where you can move and shoot, because the bar is much bigger then it, but you can move with it ofcourse

No it isn't, they share sleep rates, immobilization, and damage, but the MP40 edges it out by 4 extra bullets in the clip.

I learned that p90 is the better version of mp40. Yet p90 is cheaper price than mp40. They both do same damage. Both have same spread. (I think) Same rate of fire. P90 has less freeze and can move and shoot when fully auto. Mp40 can't move and shoot when fully auto. p90 costs $6500. Mp40 costs 10k.

Snake. Please look into this balancing.

Yeah, the MP40 is probably the worst gun in terms of cost-efficiency alongside the Mk.23 single-wield. Even dual its destroyed by Deagles or AP7s.

the worst gun is the BAR imo, yes i did buy it... but now that i think of it, it wasn't worth it because it's not even that good. Luger&Colt6 FTW