random sparrers forum
 

honestly there is no best sparrer
there are alot of good sparrers a few really good sparrers

Like for Iphone sparrers in no order
me nite kevin91 blake greenarrow maniac (Tae) Brenda dominick noss vlad comyt voodoo mixed klay fro oxide aka primetime.

Pc players on iclassic
Thallen david ares (rashard) Mr magnetic zeroos icolossus dante

Than good spar guilds in no order
Ruthless Mother US Alumni
Than SLX is Great against iphone players but average against other pc guilds
Than apostles... well mixed opinions about them but from the things ive seen from what their leader pms me and what he pms my members... i just see it as a guild full of misled sparrers and are looking for a guild because everybody else denied them except noss devi and kentaro.

Just my opinions on sparrers and guilds
i used to place sparrers over other sparrers but... i own some people some days and lose to them the next... deciding whos better is hard, I think people should just have a list of respected sparrers or good sparrers in no order.

I am the bestest sparer-er

woah woah woah
where the **** is my name man

Nu am da best sparaererar. U suk becuse u use 2g haha n0ob.

No more sparring threads they're boring

People have different definitions of what "the best" is in sparring. I could beat six people that Qes can't beat, and then Qes could beat me and the majority of iClassic players would say he's better than me (just as an example).

That's never really how I've thought of "the best." For me it's always been looking at which sparrers can beat the most number of highly-skilled sparrers, consistently. There are players who I find difficult to beat that I'd say sparrers who are much "worse" than me seem to beat relatively easily, etc.

I don't really have a list to share because it'd be a boring list with no surprises, but people need to look at the big picture when they are judging other sparrers. Everyone will occassionally spar very poorly. On my way to try and go 1000-18 (to get 10000-999), I started 500-5 and ended 228-13.
If you beat someone in a spar, it doesn't suggest you are "a better sparrer" than them, it means that you beat them in a spar. Even if you beat someone in a series, it means dirt. It means you were better than them during the 10 minutes that you sparred.

My rant isn't pointless and I only say these things because of how poor the attitudes and egos of the sparring community are. When you lose, shut up. You lost. It doesn't matter if they lagged, walled, whatever. You lost a minute-long spar because you couldn't micromanage and outplay the person you were sparring. Don't make any excuse or whine about it, it just makes you look a lot worse.

The Best ^

there is no best

:[ Im not Best i have 1000 - 100 Record and I Boosted it

I'm a saint...

its there you just cant see it... i didnt forget to write your name. thats not possible.

I think its about consistancy against other good sparrers. Numbers dont mean much to me. because some people go 8k-7k than go 10k-7.5k becase they improved.
I just made a list off the top of my head.
Complaining after a loss is fine by me. its a game i dont cate what people think about me

There isn't a best. Numbers dont mean anything. Take Slayer from ET for example. He used to br bad at spar but once he was determined to get better he did it. Just because your negative doesnt mean your a "noob" or cant spar. It just means you need to improve

Thallen says that "there is no best" however clearly, prado did exist at one time, R.I.P. best

So yeah a quick question for all of you 'spar folks' who can answer this for me. This has been lingering on my mind for a while and I just wanted to know:

Why do you all hate each other?

I don't venture into the Battle Arena too often but whenever I stop by, it's like I'm watching a Spanish Soap Opera with poor subtitling.

Everyone lags,
Everyone walls,
Everyone is PC,
Everyone complains,
No one gets along.