Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Graal Discussion (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Has Era surpassed Classic? (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25534)

Summertime Love 08-09-2014 05:23 AM

Has Era surpassed Classic?
 
Every since the launch of Era, EUROCENTER's second installment of the GraalOnline game series, Era's population per day has been increasing while Classic's been growing as well, but growing at a much slower rate.
My question is: Has Era surpassed Classic by popularity(and quality?)
Edit:I'm not flamebaiting guys ;~; I genuinely love both games equally and keep it cute

iHot 08-09-2014 05:25 AM

Incoming flame wars. Sound the alarms.

LoociGraal 08-09-2014 05:53 AM

Definitely not in quality. Classic still has it's loyal players though. Right now classic has 3370 players on and era has 3170 so it's really not that big of a difference but I will say era has more updates just not the best quality.

rorriM 08-09-2014 05:56 AM

Era has more than that actually. Today I saw our player count hovering around 3.5k

iHot 08-09-2014 06:35 AM

Has Era surpassed Classic?
 
Quote:

Posted by rorriM (Post 497136)
Era has more than that actually. Today I saw our player count hovering around 3.5k


Era will eventually consistently have more players than Classic one day. However the two games are very different and just appeal to different people.

MrSimons 08-09-2014 06:41 AM

Era is great, but to be honest Classic is definitely better. I may be a little biased however, since I have put a few 1000 more hours into Classic than I have Era.

Quote:

Posted by iHot (Post 497142)
Era will eventually consistently have more players than Classic one day. However the two games are very different and just appeal to different people.

Your signature sucks btw

iHot 08-09-2014 06:42 AM

Quote:

Posted by MrSimons (Post 497144)
Era is great, but to be honest Classic is definitely better. I may be a little biased however, since I have put a few 1000 more hours into Classic than I have Era.





Your signature sucks btw


I can't make the tongue move. Whatever it's still sexy and you said it's ok to use it on Era-Go lol. I just removed the sixth bar.

MrSimons 08-09-2014 06:51 AM

Quote:

Posted by iHot (Post 497145)
I can't make the tongue move. Whatever it's still sexy and you said it's ok to use it on Era-Go lol. I just removed the sixth bar.

for you.

http://i.imgur.com/3jjwv6I.gif

Dusty 08-09-2014 07:17 AM

Quote:

Posted by MrSimons (Post 497147)

Or you can break the image apart and do this:


I can't really edit gifs right now, but all you'd have to do is crop the top of the gif off and you can easily just change the image above it instead of editing the image itself :P

MrSimons 08-09-2014 07:30 AM

Ohhh, I get what you're saying. Doing it the easy way I see >:o

Howl 08-09-2014 09:27 AM

When presents where released in classic, 4100 people where on. However, I check now and again, Era has more players online, but the thing that put me off the most, where the quality of some of the 4th of July hats in Era.

MrSimons 08-09-2014 10:02 AM

Quote:

Posted by Howlgraal (Post 497177)
When presents where released in classic, 4100 people where on. However, I check now and again, Era has more players online, but the thing that put me off the most, where the quality of some of the 4th of July hats in Era.

I dont think the quality of a server should be determined upon temporary holiday content. Since the quality of each holiday update varies.

ex. Classic may have some badass Halloween stuff, but their 4th of July stuff sucks, while on Era it could be the other way around.

Whats really important is how well done and thought out actual updates are, which is usually very obvious by stuff like Graphic Quality, how organized the update seems (does it seem like it was just released so the server could have an update, or was there a purpose behind it? Did it tie in with other content being released recently/soon?).

Crono 08-09-2014 01:34 PM

Era is very low quality and has less players.

pat 08-09-2014 02:14 PM

I do agree that Classic iPhone has a very high quality, most likely on graphics, their graphics are really very nice and I admire them. I wish I could do graphics like they do, one day. But I do think Era iPhone has more content than Classic because of the quests and new content; and Classic only releases hats and mounts most of the time, and no new content like quests but the thing I like with Classic is that they respond to posts on their threads and fix bugs faster than Era does. And Classic is only fun if you have active friends to play with, in my opinion.

MisaChan 08-09-2014 03:03 PM

Era and Classic is on the same level or they have a balanced on gameplay.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.