![]() |
Ratio vs High wins
Let's say you manage to get a lot of wins. What would you rather have?
An 8:1 ratio, 8,000-1,000 / 2,400-300 or 60,000-15,000, 4:1 ratio Which would you prefer? You get both fairly easily and legit. |
Second
|
Ratio is pointless , too many selective sparrers have abused it (primel,pazkez,eko,smackdown,Marc,etc)
|
Wins, ratio would just make players want to be selective in spar.
..AND Before this group who will comment on this spar thread then decide to change pk, I pker and majority of pkers won't want kill/death ratio on profile. |
Ratio given the general knowledge that I'd kms before sideroom unless things changed
|
I would like wins, losses, and ratio, and kills, deaths, and ratio on profiles. At some point, you have to forget the sensitive players' opinions and show statistics to create more competition.
|
A lot of people have said,
"Wins, because that means you have more experience, and have sparred against everyone." "Wins, because it's less common to have that many." I did a separate poll in-game, and counted 32 for wins, and 7 for ratio. I think most of the people that picked ratio, picked it, since it's a lot easier to get 8,000 wins, than 40k+. |
Quote:
|
If you could obtain both legitimately then obviously I would say ratio. Assuming "legit" means no side rooming or selective sparring noobs. If you go 8,000-1,000 in the main room then you should get a much better ratio at 60k wins than 4:1.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Could just make a room coded like the crab chance room, where it has a player limit, and the next person to enter crab chance enters a new room. Up to staff, idk, maybe they are busy. What I think could get done with current staff knowledge. Spoiler
|
Quote:
|
same thing, dude
if your deaths are shown, your ratio is shown as long as you can do basic math |
Doesn't really matter that much. Just a number.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.