| Master Shredder |
01-19-2017 04:48 PM |
Quote:
Posted by ethacon
(Post 757788)
The thing is though, iClassic isn't supposed to be canon to the GtA storyline as it is based on it rather than a sequel. Would be weird to have a Tristam II in iClassic when there never was a Tristam there in the first place so it makes more sense to name him Tristam. Besides, things in iClassic aren't meant to be exactly like GtA including the design of areas and the look of NPCs.
|
Agreed I guess. Iclassic is the time period after the war that raged 10,000 years ago so I guess then.
But the storyline also follows with the guild forts being removed. Just like Snowtown Fort was destroyed by some group, pyrats or something in the timeline. so it would be nice to atleast follow other things.
So what if tristam was never in Iclassic before. the guard by the graal cathedral still decides to speak of his name than just saying "The king of graal"
|