Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   GraalOnline Classic (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Lag Cap Campaign (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4001)

iJoker 02-11-2012 12:55 AM

Lag Cap Campaign
 
Graal Classic (iPhone Server) needs a lag cap in its spar. Lag has always been a problem on many servers not just Graal iClassic but since the new spar system was uploaded, it has became an increasingly bigger problem. Often people have been taking advantage with their 'lag' or 'delay' and getting spar streaks up to 30 or more wins and turning the spar leaderboard into shambles. To improve Graal Classic spar and to ensure a fairer game we need a lag cap around about 300ms.

Many people would agree with me, that this has become a problem in Classic and the problem should be resolved as soon as possible.

Rexx 02-11-2012 12:58 AM

the mexican population in graal does not support this

Higbey 02-11-2012 01:01 AM

This needs to be added

iJoker 02-11-2012 01:07 AM

I don't know about you guys but i find it also a problem when my wifi spikes as im joining a spar, and i experience a messed up spar because of it. I would also find this beneficial in that sense too.

Comyt 02-11-2012 01:23 AM

of course, i support this. dante (demon) just got #1 spot on our leaderboard by putting tinfoil on his router to produce lag. something must be done. quick.

Gambit Drakul 02-11-2012 01:28 AM

I agree with this.

Tyler 02-11-2012 01:56 AM

I would like to see a lag cap too. However, there are people who don't have good Wi-Fi and can't do anything about it. With this being said, I think they should have only one or two rooms with this cap so the people who have the router problems at times can spar in the rooms without lag caps.

Notorious# 02-11-2012 02:26 AM

:'''''(
I guess I'll have to move to America then.

Aran 02-11-2012 02:28 AM

I completely agree with this lag cap idea. Probably half my losses are from either my own lag or someone else lagging.

Azrael 02-11-2012 03:37 AM

I'll see what I can have one of our scripters do. I think the best solution would be to have a number of rooms that are Lag Capped and a number that aren't, so people with crappy routers can still participate. That'd have to measure into the scoreboards somehow though.

fp4 02-11-2012 03:49 AM

A 300 ms lag cap is ridiculously tiny.

Maybe they could just re-allocate the staff they had looking for off-map glitchers and moderate the spar leader board instead.

Perhaps even reset boosters stats and ban them from participating in ranked spars.

Xavier 02-11-2012 03:53 AM

Quote:

Posted by fp4 (Post 66705)
A 300 ms lag cap is ridiculously tiny.

-^

This is a good idea, but 300 ms is quite an unfair cap.

Notorious# 02-11-2012 04:08 AM

So if I enter a spar with say 110ms then half way through I get lag spikes what would happen?

Rexx 02-11-2012 05:11 AM

Quote:

Posted by Azrael (Post 66702)
I'll see what I can have one of our scripters do. I think the best solution would be to have a number of rooms that are Lag Capped and a number that aren't, so people with crappy routers can still participate. That'd have to measure into the scoreboards somehow though.

Lol then all of them can be dissed and ripped on for being laggers by the everyone else.

Pazx 02-11-2012 05:37 AM

300 is way too low, if you even considered that you're stupid as hell.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.