|
*facepalm* I understand it, I've researched it. My point is I don't believe it's true as MY personal belief, respect that. Gravity and electricity are true because those were proven, the big bang is just a theory. It hasn't been proved or inproved. Same as God, neither proved or inproved. There are evidences that back both up, but to to and say as "it's true" to either, is too far.
|
It's not a matter of belief. There is plenty of evidence that supports the big bang theory and very little reason to not accept it other than ignorance on the subject. The big bang is not "just" a theory, it's the leading theory attempting to explain the state of the Universe in its very early days.
There is no evidence supporting your god, and the difference between the two (big bang and the existence of a god) is that you can eventually prove/disprove the big bang theory while the existence of a supernatural being will never be proven or disproven.
|
Posted by Blueh
And how is the big bang being compared to a bomb a bad example? They both explode. That's like saying comparing a pot and pan is a bad example when the subject is cooking.
|
A logical person would simply respond with "and that's exactly how I know you're clueless" but I'll respond with: calling it a "big bang" and describing "explosions" are simply for convenience. The big bang wasn't an explosion in the same sense as a bomb, people only say that to make it easier to explain. The specific and most important point of the big bang theory is that the Universe started at a singularity and then rapidly expanded. Scientific evidence all supports this, as opposed to contradicting findings.
It's not like a bomb where the Universe was torn up and exploded all over the place, not at all, lol.