|
Now you're just contradicting yourself. I'm going to assume you never even bothered to look into things such as miracles or things that just cannot be explained. Much like how the believed heads of some saints do not decompose or rot, even after centuries past. They have stuff like this on display (their heads are pale since all the blood dried up over time). For like the 20th time or so I'll say it again, there's a reason the Big Bang Theory is a theory. It's never been proven or disproven. There's evidence supporting the theory. But it does not prove it. As there is the same for a diety, which would be completely ignorant to say there isn't without looking into it.
|
I didn't contradict myself anywhere there, which shows how clueless you are. The Universe isn't expanding
IN space, it's expanding
SPACE ITSELF. Furthermore, unlike religion, the Big Bang theory
can be proven or disproven while supernatural beings, such as the God Christians/Jews/Muslims believe in,
can't be proven or disproven. Thus far, there is plenty of evidence to support the Big Bang theory as opposed to disproving it. Don't bring up things like "miracles" or "unexplained" things. That's all pseudoscience. You can go on YouTube and find plenty of unexplained and bizarre things, it doesn't mean a thing. 2100 years ago mankind thought Gods were the reason that it rained, thundered, etc. Hope that puts things into perspective.
Pass high-school physics, blaze through a course we had called "Theory of Knowledge", and take some courses in general + special relativity then come back at me. You're well out of your depth.
|
I wasn't being serious Dragon, but part of the argument for atheism is that you don't need validation from some made up omnipresent deity to justify doing good things.
|
See, I don't like statements like this. Atheism is simply the lack of belief in a supernatural being. Two atheists have only that in common. They don't share the same beliefs, ways of life, etc. I know it's only human to look for the most common dominator in two people and stereotype them based off of that, but with atheism that doesn't really hold up. For example, some atheists will do good for the sake of doing good (this is a whole different subject but to be honest, whether we like it or not, people who do good are actually being selfish. I can debate this but it doesn't belong here) while others, such as Stalin, do bad for the sake of being assholes.