|
the campaign was fine but... multiplayer is even worse than halo reach. 343 absolutely ruined it. multiplayer is pretty much a Call of Duty in space now. Instant spawns? Check. Perks? Check. Killstreaks? Check. Automatic headshot aim assist? Check. Has this become the standard for every shooter now? Why would 343 throw out the classic style of halo multiplayer that made the game great in the first place?
I should of rented it ;_;
|
the Halo 4 multiplayer is pretty neat in my opinion. I hated the reach campaign and multiplayer. Yes it looks like COD, but that doesn't mean it isn't epic. I'm not that much of a COD fan but I really like what 343 did to the war games. Also I don't think that the classic halo style made the game great, the armor and the fact that you don't have to hold a button to aim did. 343 didn't take that away. I disagree with some of the points you made. Who cares about instant spawning? That doesn't ruin the game in my opinion. Besides that there aren't killstreaks. Its about the points you get, not the streaks. I know that its the same concept but still, this doesn't ruin it in my opinion. Automatic headshot aim assist...? lolwhat. The only thing i dislike are perks. But that doesn't completely ruin the game right? ;o 343 did good by adding everyone sprint because people in reach who had that perk always had alot of advantages and such. I hope team snipers will be added though =[
I think Halo 4 is amazing =D