|
Right to bear arms was made back in a time period that a single man couldn't conceal a handgun and use it to kill over 20 people without being caught or stopped.
To our founding fathers the ideal of a pocket sized weapon capable of rapidly firing accurate shots without needing to reload often, that didnt jam, backfire, or require any complex or slow reloading...
It's the equivalent of what a ironman suit that doesnt fly would be to us.
Now please tell me, why you would need a high powered, rapid fire, concealable gun, for protecting your house in the united states?
As for rebelling against a corrupt government, the army has helicopters, bombers, jets, tanks, assault gear, And missiles, does that mean every community is entitled to having all of that available?
If you are in a situation, where you need to defend yourself against over 10 armed hostiles, all attacking in rapid succession, you have probably already broken a law to get into that mess.
We have destroyed almost all of the habitat and population of any American mammal that would pose a threat to us, so yea, you probably don't need that kinda firepower anyway, as if even a grizzly bear would taken over 5 shots anyway.
Police are regulated on what they can use, you let citizens use guns police can't even use, citizens don't even need a personality test and training and such to get a gun, let alone one you can use to kill so many people in a row without being stopped.
|