|
Forget my last statement :
The solution is we don't have to accept something just because somebody thinks they have the right to decide what's the new normal. We still need to respect homosexual people as fellow human beings and stop this prejudice, but allowing them marriage just to show we aren't prejudice isn't a good solution. An example :
You want to know why we had a complete stranger, who was barely even qualified to be president, become our elected leader? We wanted to put our countries rascist past behind us. Not even considering the fact that Obama seemed to have appeared out of nowhere.
|
That's a bad example. It's a stretch to say "we wanted to put the countries racist past behind us." It depends on the number of voters and their political grouping (which I find to be complete bs and slightly racist in itself).
It's about human morality. If you allow yourself to go against the idea, "separation of church and state," you open up all kind of religious reasonings to rationalize yourself. Like George W. Bush: paraphrase: "God wanted me to be president." Marriage is religious and legal. The personal beliefs you hold should not influence your capacity to judge laws as applicable and just. If marriage is a binding agreement, any two people should be able to do it.