I thought of a concept for this... a man is trying to become world famous from his job, he might be an actor or whatever.. he has friends, family, loved ones etc. This feat actually happens and he becomes world famous, everybody knows him, loves him etc. but does he still not deserve the privacy or to keep what he has with friends just because he has become famous? (I think this concept works...  ) |
this doesnt apply to what im talking about. im talking about abuse of powers and the advantage an admin has, owning a gang and basing competitively, over those other non-admin gangs.
if admins are allowed to own gangs, fine. but there is NO REASON at all, they should be allowed to be on both accounts (admin and non-admin) at same time and no reason any admin should be allowed to be in a gang (ANY GANG) WHILE ON an admin account.
make that illegal, boom, no abuse.