|
I tell Person A, "Would you like to use a knife or a gun?" He picks a gun.
I tell Person B, "Would you like to use a knife or a gun?" He picks a knife.
Person A and Person B fight. Person A shoots Person B in the head before he can even get within distance to stab him.
Following the logic of a huge portion of this thread, you would claim that the fight was unfair. But can you explain how it was unfair when both were given the exact same choice?
Person B chose the knife. Does this elementary analogy do it for you? Can you now see why I think some of you are just flat out whiners and idiots for choosing to use the iDevice when you claim that the PC is obviously better?
|
Lol ur ******ed
Ur to stupid to even the understand the argument. The argument has never about not wanting to use a pc. People play on whatever they want and the fact still stands pc s are stronger than idevices.
I tell Person A, "Would you like to use a knife or a gun?" He picks a gun.
I tell Person B, "Would you like to use a knife or a gun?" He picks a knife.
Person B had two
snipers in place mr speed and mr speedboost
Person A and Person B fight. Mr xspeed shoots Person A in the head before he can even get within distance to shoot him.
Following the logic of a huge portion of this thread, you would claim that the fight was unfair. But can you explain how it was unfair when both were given the exact same choice?
ALREADY TOLD YOU THAT YOU SUCK AT USING EXAMPLES