Graalians - View Single Post

Yami · 03-26-2013

it would go down more like this, again, this is only my opinion. This way. Players are still getting there items of interest, but without ruining graals economy, might even raise it a small bit, seeing how players would farm/buy packs to buy off of who ever has the item of interest.

If you define what FP4 said, it is not trading, but rather -- Player-To-Player buying and selling.

The term of "trading" should be dropped, clearly it isn't trading, it is player-to-player buying and selling.

03-26-2013	13
Yami Alumni Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Babord Police Department Posts: 739	it would go down more like this, again, this is only my opinion. This way. Players are still getting there items of interest, but without ruining graals economy, might even raise it a small bit, seeing how players would farm/buy packs to buy off of who ever has the item of interest. If you define what FP4 said, it is not trading, but rather -- Player-To-Player buying and selling. The term of "trading" should be dropped, clearly it isn't trading, it is player-to-player buying and selling. it would go down more like this, again, this is only my opinion. This way. Players are still getting there items of interest, but without ruining graals economy, might even raise it a small bit, seeing how players would farm/buy packs to buy off of who ever has the item of interest. If you define what FP4 said, it is not trading, but rather -- Player-To-Player buying and selling. The term of "trading" should be dropped, clearly it isn't trading, it is player-to-player buying and selling.