It was more referring to your last post than anything:

"you ought not to speak on things you know nothing about sir."

Which was clearly a statement that my opinions aren't valid and that I shouldn't share them because I don't have the whole story rather than explaining what was wrong/misinformation.

"With all due respect, why? What do you care about what he did and why he left?"

Again, leading with the same unwelcoming attitude as your first post to me.

I am content now.