See, I would rather people spar for fun and enjoy sparring instead of sparring to get high on the leader-boards by selectively sparring. IMO,There should be maybe 2-3 admins trying to make the Spar Community better.
I would love a leader board like this.
Either new model for the leaderboard is progressive because it'd encourage people to spar more actively, if nothing else. No leaderboard system is going to prove who "the best" is for more than a short period of time, so I'll support anything that makes people spar more often.
http://www.graalians.com/forums/show...1&postcount=15 helps explain why the points system I outlined is a more favorable solution, because it doesn't rely entirely on who is the most active sparrer or the most skilled. It's a balance between the two. |
2nd paragraph. ^ I would love to have this as a spar ranking system
Again though, there's nothing wrong with the current leaderboard system itself. The problem is the people who abuse it and exploit it. The PC leaderboard has been really clean example for a long time.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I agree. But the iDevice leaderboard's been pretty bad. Considering I heard Comyt used the 350 glitch to get his rank/rating