|
No. People with good computers who still play Graal only play because of nostalgia and they grew up playing it back when online games were limited. The game play is so unique and hard to master, no one wants to spend time on a ****ty drawn 2d game so they can beat the same 40 kids every day. With the current games on the market PC Graal will never thrive again.
|
I've seen iPhone players with good computers who have gave PC Graal a try.
p.s the majority of PC players didn't start when Graal was in its golden age or anything. They started well after 'superior' 2D/3D games were on the market that they could easily run.
|
Posted by PC_Dusk
So you're saying the last revamp was 8 years ago, and since then we've had players develop it. That's 8 years of just going down hill, something obviously isn't working and the game just keeps becoming more and more outdated. If the game was good people would have paid the 40 dollars for 8 months of gold.
Say the game wasn't player developed, 3d models were made of the most popular characters and the game was developed to support a mass amount of players. On top of that say the game isn't hidden in some sketchy unknown french produced client and actually up on steam. I guarantee you Era would be 100% more successful.
|
So you're saying a properly developed game would be more successful than a playermade Graal server catering to existing Graalians? No way dude!!!
The topic is why a Graal server isn't a success. Era isn't its own game. We all know Graal isn't big, comparing it to proper games is a waste of time.
p.s2 ever since Era was first released in 2003 it was always near the top in terms of playercount. 100% playermade. It went down then went up again after Stefan, Skyld, and probably others revamped the NPCs/system. It still dominates the playercount. Era
was a success, it's Graal overall that was declining hard. OP is confusing Graal's garbage state with Era's.