|
lol absolute, as long and WHO decides what has the potential of harming other people? the same people that think bad manga can possibly hurt people? If whites want to tell other whites to kill minorities who are you to limit their freedoms as Americans? How can you PROVE that people will actually do it?
i dont see how that proves your point. i just showed you how flawed your post was. every person has their own take on freedom, theres no standard as to how people feel about it.
and you know this because?
supported it? idk if you know but one of the big reason this country was able to get rid of the articles of confederation and establish our constitution was because slavery was left out of it for the most part. I dont know if those are the supporters youre talking about.
who decides what types of freedoms cause harm to others? how is me telling people at a rally to kill certain kinds of people a danger to others? whos going to PROVE that my words are going to make someone do something like killing?
you got that out of one subject I think should be restricted. ;0 Is the artist going to die if he cant draw children being raiped? Cant he possibly just draw something else.
you mean this study where you assumed?
|
Out of curiosity, have you taken an american history class?
The articles of confederation were revamped into the constitution because the AoC didn't provide the government with enough power. It didn't allow for taxation, or anything that would strengthen the US. There were structural issues with the AoC. There was also fear that the constitution would give the government too much power, so the bill of rights was created.
If you google "is slavery mentioned in the constitution", you get this:
|
The Constitution that the delegates proposed included several provisions that explicitly recognized and protected slavery. Without these provisions, southern delegates would not support the new Constitution--and without the southern states on board, the Constitution had no chance of being ratified.
|
It's quite the opposite, actually. The southerners wanted slavery protected by it.
Your point about proving what can cause harm is a good one; however, there's one flaw with it.
Telling someone to commit an act of violence causes fear. When a group is rallying and telling others to lynch a minority, it causes a lot of fear. So even if they actually don't, it causes anxiety and other problems for the particular group thats threatened. It's very direct- its an order to do so. When giving a speech endorsing violence, it is your intention to cause harm to others.
Now, I know for a fact you're going to apply the concept of fear to fictional drawings, so I'll go ahead and consider it before you mention it.
Fictional drawings do not have an existent person. Additionally, they are not an order to do something. Telling someone to carry out an act of violence is very clear, and
intended to persuade someone to do so. Unless a drawing clearly states "Go and do this IRL", and then proceeds to attempt to persuade the reader to do it by gving reasons, it is not an order to do something.
The creator of the comics don't do it out of intent to harm ohers. They create them generally either to make $$$ as their job, or because they enjoy drawing them/think people will enjoy them.