|
It's not genetically inscripted in your DNA to be attracted to the same sex. Just like it's not genetically inscripted in my DNA that I prefer Sony over Microsoft.
It's not legitimately proven that liking the same gender is in our born blood or not. As far as we, the human race, know: it is based on our surroundings.
|
Unlike Sony and Microsoft though, males and females don't come with business models, updates, or new editions.
Homosexuality has been a part of nature since the start, all over the world. It's not practical for animals, since they can't reproduce-- but they do it anyway. It doesn't seem like an adaption choice. And although there is no direct scientific proof that it is the same for humans, there is scientific proof that it is normal in living things, despite what enviornment they live in.
As for the movie:
|
Also, I'm sure that if it was real, it would be a poor movie. I don't have anything against same-sex marriage, but I feel like if a movie was created for the purpose of having same sex couples, it would be rather lacking in story. IMO it would need a main story to it(adventure and whatnot), and the whole romance thing would need to be a side
element. Creating it as the sole purpose of the plot would make it feel quite generic, lacking, and overall boring.
|
I actually quite agree with this. I support homosexuality, but any plot needs to be driven by more than just one factor. It would be a shame if the first gay big picture animation film turned out to be flat and boring. Hopefully, when society comes to a point where homosexuality is less controversial, a film like this can be developed with more than just "we r gay, we r so cute"