|
And I, the #1 on the previous leaderboard for multiple years, do not like that one.
|
The leaderboard was changed because people like you and your friends would constantly abuse a glitch to reset your rating deviation so that you could easily get points then camp at #1, let's just put that out there...
|
We need a wins per day/week/all time leaderboard, just like there is for player killing and baddy killing (which is useless by the way, why do they have a decent leaderboard and sparrers do not?).
|
This is literally what you are saying right now:
"The current leaderboard is bad because you gain points equal to the ratio of the sparrer you beat, which means that it encourages players to spar actively. It makes more sense to have a wins leaderboard."
I don't think you realize how contradictory that sounds. Basically, you're just lobbying for an all-times spar wins leaderboard because you want something you can sit on without ever having to work for. To say that flat out wins is a better formula than weighting wins based on the ratio of the opponent you beat = obvious conflict in interest.
I'd actually love a spar leaderboard that is a 100% reflection of skill. I was probably #1 on the Mixed board 95% of the time I actively played before I suggested the new one. I've been #1 on the new one for a total of probably 20 days or something? I still prefer the new one because it punishes alternate accounts and encourages activity and less "careful" sparring. I'm not really interested in going back to a leaderboard where people can abuse a glitch and just sit at #1, that's dumb.
If we were ever supposed to go back to the old leaderboard:
- Fix the rating glitch
- Make the inactivity penalty way more frequent/severe
- Only allow sparring in the Mixed or iDevice room to affect leaderboards