and let me use your awful argument with 10-1 and 1-10 against you.
your, once again, garbage, leaderboard: let someone with a 1-1 spar ten times against brett, who has almost a 10-1 ratio, and get lucky and win one of them. that one win is equal to all of the points brett got by beating them all of the other times. who is the more skilled sparrer in this situation? brett for winning 9 times out of 10 against the average sparrer, or the average sparrer for beating brett after losing 9 times?
what your leaderboard would show: this average sparrer is equally as good as brett.
what a wins/losses leaderboard would show: brett 9-1, average sparrer 1-9. <--HOW IT SHOULD BE
now you ignorant man, do you realize which shows more skill? no? too stubborn to give in and realize that one of your own ideas absolutely sucks?