|
Which is why I took off losses from profile. They become a "showdeaths" type of thing, where only you can see them, and no one would care.
|
Still think people would use the system just to get easy wins. Especially if classic decides to bring milestone hats.
|
Ranks would become the judgement point of your skill, because spar ratio does not matter, and are placed in your profile.
|
Only for active sparers, depending on the requirements to merit a ranking. Any good sparer that just likes to spar a couple times a day would be rank inappropriately.
|
Ranks matter, because you are fighting people based on your level. The system would rank you out of everyone (est. 4500+ ranked accounts, since someone said iclassic gets 9000+ active players daily or something).
"Tier: Bronze. You are currently ranked at #xxxx out of xxxx total ranked players" (resets every season)
|
So pretty much the best ranked bronze player would be below every sparer from the top tiers. Seems to me that this ranking system goes back to the original problem comet mentioned about needing to constantly spar to be on the board.
I think the more this idea gets discussed the more complicated it gets.