|
Still think people would use the system just to get easy wins. Especially if classic decides to bring milestone hats.
Only for active sparers, depending on the requirements to merit a ranking. Any good sparer that just likes to spar a couple times a day would be rank inappropriately.
|
They can't get easy wins, because if you win enough matches then you will be promoted, and what good would that do? you won't gain anything from getting a ton of wins.
1. Your rank will never get higher by facing easy people.
2. You won't gain any prize pools that actually matter.
No, let's say 4000+ people start using ranked matches for the first time right? Then the higher tiers will be winning more often than lower tier players. If you aren't putting effort into ranking up, then your rank will disappear either way. If they just spar a couple times a day then they should be at least silver-gold (which is fine), if they spar higher tiers in 1 match, and win then they will get even more points.
|
So pretty much the best ranked bronze player would be below every sparer from the top tiers. Seems to me that this ranking system goes back to the original problem comet mentioned about needing to constantly spar to be on the board.
|
I don't think the problem was constantly sparring to be on board, I believe it was "anyone can spar a lot, and be high on the board". A tier system would require skill, and you can't camp at the top.