these "legends" are just your opinion and this would be ridiculous.
i'd prefer not to run around graal and see a statue of "aimee" who seriously did nothing but pollute the guild fort leaderboard with multiple 1k guilds.
people who actually did something:
sparrers --- we have books in the library for first people to achieve 10k, 20k, 30k, and 40k wins. these are "legends" as they were really good players who were first to achieve these milestones, some of them before you even downloaded graal.
gst winners --- we have books in some building in mod town showing the teams who won each gst. these are "legends" for beating out many guilds and claiming the belt in the most overhyped competition in the whole game.
pkers --- they're on the top of the all-time leaderboard for now and have quite some time left before the riot boosters ovetake them. look there for your "pk legends" while they last! they probably deserve a "first to hit 100k" type thing too if anyone remembers the order (probably nobody).
tower takers --- they have many hats which they abused the guild system for, they have disgusting mounts, etc. that should be enough rewards for them. i personally don't think they should be praised as "legends" at all for sitting there in a fort spamming their guildchats for many hours. they barely even got attacked.
staff members --- we have suckups like you praising them until the end of time begging for admin hugs. no need for an "ellybelly" statue please lmfao. +rufus is pretty much the only one who actually did anything productive. please no "coco88" i'm never worshipping that as a legend.