I'm well aware of what is listed on this wikipedia page which is definitely one of the reasons I am posting this; I simply disagree. You do not get ordered a cease & desist, recycle your game development tools, rename the game and then continue to include the previous illegal title as a version of the new title. From the vernacular, I also feel it severely diminishes the magic, potency, & purity of Graal as it is when it was erected.
This is a game about the Holy Grail at the dawn of the Age of Aquarius; Zelda Online is a tribute to Zelda:ALTTP which is a ripoff from the 90s. Technically speaking, as well, from an HONEST marketing & cultural perspective—it doesn't make any sense to attempt to call a new game a continuation of a previous cease & desist which was a knockoff of another title.
|
Antago sounds as if he's been sued for copyright infringement before with how much he's pushing this game being legal. It is a zelda clone. The "zelda online" game was actually called Graal already when I first played it and still called Graal when they changed the tileset to not look like zelda a link to the past. Stefan never made a public statement saying they are two separate games. He made enough changes to not get sued (considering it used zelda's exact graphics in early versions of Graal).
|
Do you think Graal is illegal? What are you saying? lol