Classic needs to require their staff to get evidence when banning a player. At the very least, this is professional. Graal hires players to voluntarily moderate their servers, so to trust them to ban players without any accountability for their actions is ridiculous. iZone requires evidence when disciplining players, and the system requires their staff to prove their bans are valid. It's absurd to pretend like the volunteer staff can be trusted, because every server has had multiple staff that have been caught being corrupted and breaking rules. iEra does not require evidence for their jailings, and when I was hired, I was shocked. I thought that I was literally able to jail anyone I want for whatever reason I want, and I wouldn't get caught. It also made me wonder if other staff actually do that. That wouldn't be an issue if they required evidence for their bans. I bring this up because I was wrongly banned for "Hacking" when I was doing nothing of the sorts, and when told to send a ticket to toonslab, it's a waste of time, because they don't require evidence, so they don't know if your ban should be overturned or not. They simply look at your history, or the ban category/how much time is left and decide- they might as well just ask a magic 8 ball if they should unban you. Anyways, that's only my reason for bringing an idea up that would make Classic more professional, and the staff more accountable.