|
The amount of gun crime not related to mass shootings > the amount of gun crime related to mass shootings
I am not in favor of restrictions because if someone breaks into my house, I demand a way to defend myself from that person, being the ability to take my gun and shoot them if necessary.
|
|
So because the amount of mass shooting crimes is less than gun crimes that aren't mass shooting, means we shouldn't ban guns?
|
No, what he's saying is that he doesn't want guns to be banned because he wants a way to protect himself from the crime that is not considered mass shootings. You think criminals have legal guns? You can ban guns and they will still be able to get guns, but that would only mean that your average citizen is screwed if he is attacked.
He even mentioned that he's ok with gun restrictions, so he understands something needs fixing. I also don't think banning would solve the problem of mass shootings.
|
Yeah, it's still a fairly small percentage that it would affect but it's still a lot of people dying to something because 19112526518 wants his freedom.
|
How many people you think actually die because they get killed by the legal owner of the gun(not accident)?
The problem is making the argument based on what 987897454 said. Guns were given to the people, so they could protect themselves. Stupid people with guns kill people and stupid people translate the constitution wrong Looking at you 75977897689679
