No, what he's saying is that he doesn't want guns to be banned because he wants a way to protect himself from the crime that is not considered mass shootings. You think criminals have legal guns? You can ban guns and they will still be able to get guns, but that would only mean that your average citizen is screwed if he is attacked.
He even mentioned that he's ok with gun restrictions, so he understands something needs fixing. I also don't think banning would solve the problem of mass shootings.
How many people you think actually die because they get killed by the legal owner of the gun(not accident)?
The problem is making the argument based on what 987897454 said. Guns were given to the people, so they could protect themselves. Stupid people with guns kill people and stupid people translate the constitution wrong Looking at you 75977897689679  |
You will not stop mass shootings. But you can decrease mass shootings. Crime cannot be stopped.