That's easy for you to say, because you're probably not living in the First World or in a superpower like the US, UK, Russia, etc. If a country like us doesn't intervene, the vacuum created by terrorist groups in these regions becomes so big that they probably have the capability to overthrow local governments, and then what do we eventually have on our hands? A bunch of idiots armed with nuclear and/or chemical weapons that they're willing to fire off for their 72 ******s? No thanks, pal.

I'd love to stop interfering in "polite" ways though, because we're getting **** on for it. We get criticized if we don't intervene, and we get taken advantage of if we do. We need to stop sending in ground troops and start flying over with B-52s. Innocent people will die, but that's part of war and sending a message that we can't be threatened or toyed with.

Is that a joke? Like I said before, the US has to play by a particular set of rules that these scumbags don't. A few radical Islamists shooting AR15s at innocent people in California is nothing compared to the complete destruction that we could do to ISIL. If a Republican wins the election, especially Trump or Cruz (which I'm sure they won't), then it's not going to be pretty for that region of the world.