|
01-14-2016
|
32
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chewbaccastan
Posts: 1,013
|
|
Some bans are very easy to provide evidence for. Inappropriate names, statuses, pm histories, etc. are able to be logged. When it comes to things like that, staff almost always have evidence to back it up. However, when it comes to situations like hacking, purposefully blocking paths, etc. the staff members have no way of logging what they player is doing (at least they didn't when I was staff). The GP use their best judgement and take action that way. Usually they will provide a small explanation of what was happening and why the player deserved the ban in the account log. When players appeal bans, the person in charge of appeals will look through the player's log and see what the issue was. More times than not the person in charge of appeals will believe the GP over the player, so if a reason for the ban was given and it sounds believable then the player will most likely remain banned.
|
If I was banned for hacking when I wasn't and if they have no proof that I was hacking except what a 12 year old staff member faking to be 20 says and they rather believe the gp instead of the player that rolls in the dough for unixmads bread.... I would be pissed. Especially since hacking is basically the longest ban to wait 3 months ... Unlike the other types of bans for example harrassment that there's evidence for and players are only banned for a week if that.
|
|
|
|