|
I think all that they're really trying to say is they want someone with a more "perfect eye" to tell the difference in regards to those kinds of reports. I think the core argument on each side got blown out of proportion.
|
I also think it would be great to have a staff team full with people with a "perfect eye" but it's not just about that, you also have to be able to deal with other aspects as a GP, including being able to have a civilized discussion when a team member doesn't necessarily agree with you
and just by looking at this thread, a lot of people who might have a "perfect eye" are not able to do that
Although I do agree with you, both arguments were exaggerated I think.