I either think we need to be like England and disallow guns completely almost, or encourage gun ownership and gun carrying, but we seriously need better laws for requiring sellers of guns to run strict background and psychological tests. I don't get why Republicans and Democrats fight about guns the way they do. I don't see why Republicans don't admit that better background checks can only help. I also think some teachers in schools should carry guns (if they want to), and would go through rigorous training for safety and how to use it, plus psychological tests at least once a year, but would be better to be twice per school year. I also think they should be required to have it locked up, rather than carrying it. I personally prefer encouraging guns, but I also believe that we do need rigorous background and psychological tests, and I can't understand why anyone would disagree with that.

I wouldn't have to murder someone illegally if it wasn't illegal in the first place. That argument makes no sense. It's not about the woman's body, it's about the mother, the father, and the baby. A woman alone doesn't have a baby, there's at least 3 lives involved in that process.

Should a baby die simply because the parents are incompetent?

Yes, it matters. There is no baby until fertilization, and the pills don't interfere with that, they just prevent the sperm from reaching the egg.

I do know. You're assuming that I don't actually know, but I'm confident that I know I like living and would much rather go through struggles in life than not live at all. You're the one incorrectly assuming my beliefs.