Graalians - View Single Post

Comyt · 05-20-2016

in my opinion, ratio meant a lot more back in the day but since spar has declined, it is a lot easier to get a good ratio through selective sparring or just playing against the huge amount of negatives.

if i see someone with 1300-200 win-loss, i'm not impressed at all and assume they're a joke and really easy.

if i see someone with 27000-10000, i still don't view them as good but they're a lot better in my mind than the 1300-200 player and i have a lot more respect for them.

05-20-2016	28
Comyt Emperor Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: New York Posts: 1,000	in my opinion, ratio meant a lot more back in the day but since spar has declined, it is a lot easier to get a good ratio through selective sparring or just playing against the huge amount of negatives. if i see someone with 1300-200 win-loss, i'm not impressed at all and assume they're a joke and really easy. if i see someone with 27000-10000, i still don't view them as good but they're a lot better in my mind than the 1300-200 player and i have a lot more respect for them.