|
No, there really isn't... In what world would every person in a single, loud, crowded room be able to have a gun on them? That scenario is unrealistic, and thus does not serve as a good counter-scenario to the one that was presented. Regulating guns is realistic. Allowing every single person to have one on them at all times wherever they go is not realistic.
That's pretty the same thing as saying less people could have died in 9/11 if they had wings to fly down from the buildings. Technically that's true, but is that a realistic scenario?
|
I never said everyone would. Hell, just 1 person having a gun could stop a shooting scenario like that from becoming more severe. I also never said everyone should be able to carry a gun anywhere. You're making up balogna and pretending like I said that. There's actually more than 2 sides to the gun debate. But the biggest sides are legal, or illegal. It's naive of you to think that there's no debate about illegalizing guns completely. Illegalizing guns completely is implausible. People will still get guns. People already have guns and will not give them up. People have guns that aren't on record. It's in fact unrealistic to believe that illegalizing guns and actually enforcing that is realistic. I don't even know how to respond to completely fantasized examples. People growing wings has no correlation to people carrying guns. People can carry guns easily. That's plausible, and possible. Not sure what you're arguing either to me, since I in fact did say we need more and better regulations on guns. Seems like you're just arguing with remarks you made up yourself.