Right away: do you think she should have been recommended/should be indicted? Why? Also, do you honestly think your belief is based on the facts, rather than your political biases for/against Hillary Clinton?

After watching the Comey testimony for a while now, I thought this thread would be a good idea. I find it funmy that every Republican is questioning Comey's choices, while every Democrat is praising him for doing his job. It's entertaining. I don't think she should have been indicted based on the information I've been seen. I think Comey worded it best when he said if an FBI agent did exactly what Hillary Clinton did, and was careless with classified information, that they would have faced repercussions within their job, but would not have been criminally charged. I'm just really sick of the opinions being divided 50/50 on this issue based on political views. The law is generally straightforward, as are the facts of the case. I, nor do most of the people who comment on the case know all the facts, but we are provided with enough to understand what happened, and what the law says. I can only imagine if she had been recommended for indictment, all the Republicans would be praising Comey right now for doing his job, while all the Democrats would be questioning his political motives.