|
11-05-2016
|
189
|
|
Python
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,894
|
|
That's a bull**** excuse to say that someone's credibility is whiped away completely because they didn't come out publicly about a sexual assault on them back then. If you knew anything about sexual crimes, you would know that many victims don't want to come out at all, and that if people do come out, it gives other victims the courage to come out themselves. It's personal, degrading, and something the victim usually wants to avoid. What makes his accusers *****s? Or groupies for that matter? You gotta be idiotic to not think that a pervert in a position of power would use their power over someone else for sexual pleasure. There's rich, powerful men who do that. Just look at Bill Clinton, Roger Ailles, Anthony Weiner, and plenty more.
|
That's just the biggest get out of jail free card ever. You're literally giving every excuse as to why the victim IS RIGHT 100%. Using the logic that they can just come out 10 years later when the time is coincidentally the most opportune and that they didn't do this earlier because "many victims don't come out" then how is it even possible that they're proved wrong? I could pull some **** and say my dad beat me 14 years ago but I didn't want to come out then, but now that he's running for office I activate my trap card. Nobody could come and prove it wrong, and society today swings to the "guilty until proven innocent" mentality due to the media. I've never seen "victims" so malicious in my life, much less the sheep that blindly follow them.
|
|
|
|