Bruh you really don't see the ONE thing that connects this election with the 2008 election? Nobody is running for re-election.. That 100% effects turnout. But none of that even matters, my point is illustrated in that picture and the caption attached to it. If you disagree with that then idk what to tell you besides you're stubbornly refusing to see why the electoral college is valid.
|
I just gave examples of the 2004 and 2012 election too lol... Both of those had someone running for re-election. That illustration shows nothing to back the electoral college. If you disagree with that then idk what to tell you besides you're stubbornly refusing to see why the electoral college is invalid.
Trying to act cool as if I'm the stubborn one even though you're doing the literal exact same thing as me. Hypocrite much?
It's like agreeing to play a baseball game and losing by 2 runs but then starting a riot cause you got more hits than the other team.
|
1. I voted for Trump.
2. Your analogy makes no sense. You're comparing a game where one person has more runs than the other to an election that has 2 separate results in which each candidate won one of.
3. It seems like you support the electoral college because Trump won. I don't even definitively know who you supported, but based on your recent statement, that's exactly what you're implying.
You keep arguing the same thing without providing any evidence to back it up, while I have provided factual data that proves you wrong, but you continue blindly saying you're right. I can't help it if you won't change your opinion no matter how wrong you are.