|
? I'm not a "hard-right Conservative." I support gay marriage and I'm pro-choice. Joke's on you, buddy. I don't understand why you're still so bothered by the fact that I suggested she use her platform for something productive. If you wanna be an apologist for a religion that legally murders people within their own society in 2017, you go right ahead.
|
Mk, sorry then. The viewpoints I've seen you express in this thread anwyays fit mostly with Conservatives, and hard-right Conservatives. Not dismissing the viewpoints, just classifying not just you but many other hard-right Conservatives who have criticized Ariana Grande for her response. I don't understand why you're so bothered by her response, though. You didn't just suggest that she use her platform, you outright attacked her personally. I've never apologized for those behaviors and you know that, but your argument is weak so you have to make bull**** up to further your argument. It's a classic tool used by many that can't back up their argument, so they just attack the person they argue with.
|
Matt, no offense but I'm beyond talking to you ITT. You called me sexist for a reason no one can figure out, implied I'm "too old" to be criticizing someone 4 years younger than me (???), and now you're calling people "racist" for questioning Islam (which is a religion). I'll gladly get into that conversation if someone a little smarter wants to engage in it, though.
|
but you called me out for being an apologist for terrorists and saying that I'm okay with and not offended at all by terrorist attacks. Come on, it's a 2 way street. This is exactly how arguments lose substance.
Someone who knew the attacker from when he was a child said he was lonely and separated from society. Is that not a detail that should be weighed when determining what caused him to committ this act? I don't see many popular Muslims that are heavily involved in their community committing these attacks. Most of them are separated from society, and have few human connections.