1. That's not a human right… Being able to freely travel to other countries, unconditionally, isn't and never will be a human right: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement
2. You seem to be under the impression that the Constitution is some global law. It applies to the US and our citizens only. I don't even know why you're bringing up the Constitution when we're talking about people from Muslim nations. |
1. That's not what I was referring to. Human rights however would be violated if we surveilled Muslim communities in America solely because of their religion - which is what Trump proposed multiple times. The immigration issue, however, is a violation of the principals that America was founded on.
2. Not necessarily. It applies to the U.S. government and the Supreme Court has extended the rights to certain classifications people, which is why the ban was knocked down by the courts as being a potential constitutional violation. Also, I wasn't just talking about Muslims from other countries as you can see in #1 and my prior post that I also brought up the idea that was proposed by Trump himself to surveil people in America based on their religious beliefs. That's a violation of the Constitution.
|
extremist muslims carry out attacks, people lose their minds when islam is criticized
|
Black people kill people, but people don't criticize all black people, because that's racist. Mexicans smuggle drugs over the border, but people don't criticize all Mexicans, because that's racist. White people kill people, but people don't criticize all white people, because that's racist. A cop kills an unarmed person, and people tried to label all cops as racist killers. Other people hit back and criticized them for falsely labeling an entire group of people based on the actions of a select few. The same goes with religions. It's stereotyping a group of people, and is rightfully criticized.