|
It is impossible to tell who a "top pker" is with or without the use of this stuff.
Pk numbers are directly correlated with time spent pking. All one can do is become more efficient with their time. If by top, you mean "highest numbers" then go crazy with these arguments, but the discussion is pointless if I can just pk slowly and eventually pass you people who quit, even if I were to suck at it. Do I then become a better pker than you because I passed you in number of pks? Even if I did it without any of this? Lol
|
Twilit's comment goes along with this:
|
You become "better" at PKing the same way you get good at 1v1-- hit other people more than they hit you, and have a higher KD ratio-- metrics the game does not even measure. The only metric the game does measure is kill count, which only shows the amount of time you spend on the game x your "efficiency." And the "most efficient" way of adding kills is braindead button mashing in a highly dense spot; at which point can hardly be called a game anymore, so what's the point?
|
How many kills you get before each death is a good measure of PK skill. A kill-death ratio would be comparable to win-loss.